Abstract:Parameters in climate models are usually calibrated manually, exploiting only small subsets of the available data. This precludes both optimal calibration and quantification of uncertainties. Traditional Bayesian calibration methods that allow uncertainty quantification are too expensive for climate models; they are also not robust in the presence of internal climate variability. For example, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically require model runs and are sensitive to internal variability noise, rendering them infeasible for climate models. Here we demonstrate an approach to model calibration and uncertainty quantification that requires only model runs and can accommodate internal climate variability. The approach consists of three stages: (a) a calibration stage uses variants of ensemble Kalman inversion to calibrate a model by minimizing mismatches between model and data statistics; (b) an emulation stage emulates the parameter‐to‐data map with Gaussian processes (GP), using the model runs in the calibration stage for training; (c) a sampling stage approximates the Bayesian posterior distributions by sampling the GP emulator with MCMC. We demonstrate the feasibility and computational efficiency of this calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES) approach in a perfect‐model setting. Using an idealized general circulation model, we estimate parameters in a simple convection scheme from synthetic data generated with the model. The CES approach generates probability distributions of the parameters that are good approximations of the Bayesian posteriors, at a fraction of the computational cost usually required to obtain them. Sampling from this approximate posterior allows the generation of climate predictions with quantified parametric uncertainties. Calibrating climate models with available data and quantifying their uncertainties are essential to make climate predictions accurate and actionable. A primary source of uncertainties in climate models comes from representation of small‐scale processes such as moist convection. Parameters in convection schemes and other parameterizations are usually calibrated by hand, using only a small fraction of data that are available. As a result, the calibration process may miss information about the small‐scale processes in question. This paper presents a proof‐of‐concept, in an idealized setting, of how parameters in climate models can be calibrated using a substantial fraction of the available data, and how uncertainties in the parameters can be quantified. We employ a new algorithm, called calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES), which makes such calibration and uncertainty quantification feasible for computationally expensive climate models. CES reduces the hundreds of thousands of model runs usually required to quantify uncertainties in computer models to hundreds, thereby achieving about a factor 1,000 speedup. It leads to more robust calibration and uncertainty quantification in the presence of noise arising from chaotic variability of the climate system. We show how uncertainties in climate model parameters can be translated into quantified uncertainties of climate predictions through ensemble integrations. We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution

Targeted calibration to adjust stability biases in non-differentiable complex system models

Achieving Robust and Transferable Performance for Conservation‐Based Models of Dynamical Physical Systems

A Novel Global Model Calibration Scheme for Complex Process Systems Using an Adaptive Experimental Design

Tuning Earth System Models Without Integrating to Statistical Equilibrium

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM

Ensemble-Based Experimental Design for Targeting Data Acquisition to Inform Climate Models

Mitigation of Coupled Model Biases Induced by Dynamical Core Misfitting Through Parameter Optimization: Simulation with a Simple Pycnocline Prediction Model

Parameter Uncertainty Quantification in an Idealized GCM With a Seasonal Cycle

Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models

Basin stability and limit cycles in a conceptual model for climate tipping cascades

Multicycle Parameter Estimations in Coupled Earth System Models Based on Multiscale Sensitivity Responses in the Context of Low-Order Models

Reducing climate model biases by exploring parameter space with large ensembles of climate model simulations and statistical emulation

Limits to predictability of the asymptotic state of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a conceptual climate model

Benefits of Deterministic and Stochastic Tendency Adjustments in a Climate Model

Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions

A sequential approach to calibrate ecosystem models with multiple time series data

A global hybrid coupled model based on Atmosphere-SST feedbacks

Estimation of Ocean Biogeochemical Parameters in an Earth System Model Using the Dual One Step Ahead Smoother: A Twin Experiment

Quantifying the Role of Calibration Strategies on Surface‐Subsurface Hydrologic Model Performance

The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning

Parameter Optimization in an Intermediate Coupled Climate Model with Biased Physics