Abstract:The Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) is an area in southeastern Australia that has the largest and most regulated river system in the country. Historically, it has been an area of conflict over water resources, with efforts to bring the different states together to negotiate water sharing since the early 1900s. In the 20th century, the focus of water policy was predominantly on water supply infrastructure: building large-scale dam storages, weirs, and other irrigation region infrastructure. However, increasing problems with both water quality and quantity from the 1970s onwards—such as acid sulphate soils, salinity, declines in vegetation health, and species loss—meant that more attention was turned to water demand management options. These included establishing formal water markets, trade liberalization, and water extraction caps. The National Water Initiative (2004) and the Water Act (2007) laid the groundwork in unbundling water and land ownership and created the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA). The MDBA was tasked with developing the MDB Plan (Basin Plan 2012) to readjust the balance between consumptive water use and the environment. The Basin Plan when implemented in 2012 aimed to return up to one third of consumptive water extraction to environmental use, making it one of the biggest reallocations of water to the environment in the world. It has predominantly used market-based approaches to do so. However, conflict over water sharing has remained a dominant feature of MDB water reform. Self-interest among states and irrigation interests have impacted environmental water recovery methods, resource expenditure, and allocation—subsequently weakening both the Basin Plan and water policy in general. Given current policy developments, there is real danger of targets not being met, and environmental sustainability being continually compromised. The ongoing issues of drought, climate change, and readdressing First Nations access to—and ownership of—water have emphasized distributional issues in water sharing. It is clear also that the Basin Plan has been wrongly blamed and misattributed for ongoing rural community declines, with current amendments and reductions in water reallocation targets a result of this. What is clear is that the Basin Plan is currently not the fully sustainable solution for water sharing that it set out to be. It will need to continually evolve, along with various institutions to support water governance and rural community economic development in general, to address existing overallocation and future climate challenges. The challenges of equity, rural community development, and distributional fairness lie firmly in the sphere of strong governance, high-quality data, and first-best economic and scientific policies.

Take it as a compliment: integrating complementary measures as the next chapter of Murray–Darling Basin water management

Ten complementary measures to assist with environmental watering programs in the Murray–Darling river system, Australia

Murky waters running clearer? Monitoring, reporting and evaluation of the state of the Murray–Darling Basin after more than three decades of policy reform

Monitoring of environmental flow outcomes in a large river basin: The Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder's long‐term intervention in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

Using an ecosystem services approach to re-frame the management of flow constraints in a major regulated river basin

The Unwinding of Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin: A Cautionary Tale for Transboundary River Systems

Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Case Study in Market-Based Approach to Water Sharing in Australia

Institutional impediments to conservation of freshwater dependent ecosystems

‘Sub-Prime’ Water, Low-Security Entitlements and Policy Challenges in Over-Allocated River Basins: the Case of the Murray–Darling Basin

Are environmental water requirements being met in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia?

Establishing Environmental Water Requirements for the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia's Largest Developed River System

Missing in action: possible effects of water recovery on stream and river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

Measures to Safeguard and Restore River Connectivity

Modelling to bridge many boundaries: the Colorado and Murray-Darling River basins

Basin management inspiration from impacts of alternating dry and wet conditions on water production and carbon uptake in Murray-Darling Basin

The Australian public’s preferences for further environmental and cultural water recovery options in the Murray-Darling Basin

Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment

Ecohydrological and socioeconomic integration for the operational management of environmental flows

Using Best Worst Scaling to prioritise issues in major river catchments: The Murray Darling Basin in Australia

Research on Water Management Institution Comparison between the Yellow River Basin and Murray-Darling Basin in Australia

Un Enfoque De Regresión Armónica Dinámica Para Estimar La Evapotranspiración De Aguas Subterráneas Basado En Las Fluctuaciones Diarias Del Nivel Freático