Drug susceptibility of PCA in WBB6F1-W/Wv mice

S Kimura,A Watanabe,M Takeuchi,M Nagata,K Nakamura,M Harada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s000180050173
Abstract:Our previous study revealed that passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) can be produced in congenitally mast cell-deficient WBB6F1-W/Wv (abbreviated as W/Wv) mice on sensitization with undiluted or slightly diluted allogeneic and xenogeneic antisera but not on sensitization with allogeneic monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)E and IgG1 antibodies regardless of the antibody concentration [1]. In view of these findings, the present study was conducted to characterize PCA in this strain from its drug susceptibilities using mast cell-bearing WBB6F1-(+)/+ (abbreviated as +/+) and B6D2F1 mice as references. PCA in W/Wv mice mediated by a low dilution (1:4) of hyperimmune serum to bovine serum albumin of the B6D2F1 mouse origin was markedly suppressed by CV-6209, an antagonist of platelet-activating factor (PAF), but not by antihistamines such as cyproheptadine and oxatomide. In contrast, PCA in +/+ and B6D2F1 mice mediated by a high dilution (1:128) of the anti-serum (virtually by IgG1 antibody) was nearly completely suppressed by antihistamines but not by CV-6209. A remarkable difference between PCA in W/Wv and reference mice was also observed in the susceptibility to monoclonal anti-mouse granulocyte (Gr-1) antibody: PCA in W/Wv mice was potently suppressed by the 1- to 3-day pretreatment with this antibody but that in references was not at all. Putting these present results together with the previous finding that anti-granulocyte antibody greatly reduces circulatory Gr-1+ leukocytes, 1 to 3 days after the treatment [2], it is highly probable that PCA in W/Wv mice mediated by some antibody isotypes other than IgE and IgG1 is produced by PAF mainly released from Gr-1+ cells, while IgG1 antibody-mediated PCA in mast cell-bearing reference mice is evoked by histamine derived from mast cells. PCA homologous to that in W/Wv mice could also be produced in the reference mice on sensitization with undiluted or slightly diluted antiserum, when generalized blueing due to excess IgG1 antibody was removed by the oxatomide treatment before the antigen challenge.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?