Impact of the difference in diagnostic criteria for adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome excluding polycystic ovarian morphology

Yuko Hasegawa,Yoshikazu Kitahara,Mio Kobayashi,Miki Miida,Hitomi Nenoi,Yumiko Tsukui,Madoka Iizuka,Hikaru Hiraishi,Satoko Nakazato,Akira Iwase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15975
2024-05-29
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Abstract:Aim Exclusion of polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) from the diagnostic criteria for adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been proposed. We analyzed the profiles of adolescent women with suspected PCOS based on the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) diagnostic and Rotterdam criteria, excluding those with PCOM. Methods Thirteen‐ to twenty‐one‐year‐old women with suspected or confirmed diagnosis of PCOS according to the JSOG and Rotterdam criteria were included in this study. Patient characteristics such as hormone levels and body mass index (BMI) were compared between the groups. Correlations between BMI and testosterone, and BMI and time to diagnosis were also analyzed. Results Twenty‐nine patients were diagnosed with adolescent PCOS according to the JSOG criteria, and 11 patients according to the Rotterdam criteria after excluding the patients fulfilling the PCOM criteria. Serum testosterone levels were significantly higher in adolescents diagnosed with PCOS using the Rotterdam criteria than in those diagnosed using the JSOG criteria (p
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?