#320 : Metabolic Risks in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosed by the Rotterdam Criteria Versus the New International Criteria

Raymond Hang Wun Li,Ernest Hung Yu Ng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661318223743291
2023-12-01
Fertility & Reproduction
Abstract:Background and Aims: In the Rotterdam criteria (2003), polycystic ovary morphology for diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was defined as an antral follicle count (AFC) of 12 or more (or ovarian volume of 10 cc or more) in either ovary. In the international guideline (2018), the AFC threshold was increased to 20. We compared the metabolic risks in women with PCOS diagnosed by these two ultrasound criteria. Method: We prospectively recruited 467 women with PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria, and 240 healthy ovulatory women as controls. Of those in the PCOS cohort, 142 had AFC of 12 to 19 (Rotterdam criteria group), while 325 had AFC of 20 or above in either ovary (international criteria group). The prevalence rates of dysglycaemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS) (and its constituent components) at baseline were compared by chi-squared test. The cumulative hazard of dysglycaemia and MetS were compared between the two groups by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Compared to controls, women in both groups had significantly higher (p<0.05) prevalence of dysglycaemia, MetS, elevated waist circumference, reduced HDL-cholesterol and elevated fasting glucose. In addition, those in the international criteria group had a significantly higher (p<0.05) prevalence of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypertension. Upon longitudinal follow-up censored at the sixth completed year, 23 (16.3%) women in the Rotterdam criteria group versus 80 (24.8%) women in the international criteria group had dysglycaemia (p=0.044), with a hazard ratio of 1.560 (95% CI 1.005-2.389) (p=0.048). Meanwhile, 33 (23.2%) and 96 (29.7%) women in the Rotterdam and international criteria groups respectively had MetS (p=0.151), with a hazard ratio of 1.343 (95% CI 0.910-1.984) (p=0.138). Conclusion: Women with PCOS, either diagnosed by the AFC threshold of the Rotterdam criteria or international criteria, are both at elevated risks of dysglycaemia and MetS, with the latter group demonstrating an exaggerated risk of dysglycaemia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?