Abstract:Although the relationship between molecular and supramolecular chirality remains elusive, the existing results have demonstrated the vital role of hydrophilic motifs in controlling the supramolecular handedness of peptide nanofibrils compared with hydrophobic ones. However, unlike conventional hydrophobic residues, we speculate that aromatic hydrophobic residues are mostly likely to play a unique role in regulating the supramolecular handedness because the π−π stacking interactions of their side chains are directional like hydrogen bonding and can direct high levels of self-assembly due to the geometric confining of aromatic rings. To confirm this hypothesis, we here design a series of amphiphilic short peptides, with their hydrophobic motifs being composed of aromatic residues. Their short lengths not only favor their structural stability, synthesis, and sequence variation but also enable us to readily link their molecular and supramolecular structures. Through the combination of experiments and theoretical simulations, we demonstrate that the peptides containing L-form aromatic residues form left-handed nanofibrils while those containing D-form aromatic residues assemble into right-handed ones, irrespective of the chirality of their C-terminal hydrophilic residue. Theoretical calculations revealed that the stacking of aromatic side chains between β-strands directed the twisting direction of the β-sheets formed, with L- and D-form phenylalanine side chains stacking in a clockwise and anti-clockwise way, and more ordered and stronger aromatic stacking for homochiral peptides facilitated the formation of nanofibrils with a marked tubular feature. This study has bridged the knowledge gap in our understanding of how aromatic residues affect the supramolecular chirality of short peptides.

Heterochiral π‐stacking dimerization of helical secondary structures with emerging supramolecular chirality

“Majority‐rules” Effect on Supramolecular Chirality and Optoelectronic Properties of Chiral Tetrachloro‐Perylene Diimides

Cover Feature: Assembly and Chiral Memory Effects of Dynamic Macroscopic Supramolecular Helices (Chem. Eur. J. 62/2018)

Protein‐based 2D Nanoarchitectures Constructed by Heterochiral π‐Stacking Dimerization of Helical Foldamers

Chirality-induced supramolecular nanodishes: enantioselectivity and energy transfer

Simultaneous switching of supramolecular chirality and organizational chirality driven by Coulomb expansion

Assembly and Chiral Memory Effects of Dynamic Macroscopic Supramolecular Helices.

Polymerization‐Induced Helicity Inversion Driven by Stacking Modes and Self‐Assembly Pathway Differentiation

The role of aromatic residues in controlling the supramolecular chirality of short amphiphilic peptides

Controlling Supramolecular Chirality of Two-Component Hydrogels by J- and H-Aggregation of Building Blocks

Reversible Manipulation of Supramolecular Chirality using Host-Guest Dynamics between β-Cyclodextrin and Alkyl Amines.

Hydrogen-bonding regulated supramolecular chirality with controllable biostability

Activation and Deactivation of Chirality Transfer in the Superbundles of Sequence‐defined Stereoisomers

Helicity Inversion of Supramolecular Hydrogels Induced by Achiral Substituents.

Chiral inversion induced by aromatic interactions in short peptide assembly

Self-assembled helical columnar superstructures with selective homochirality

Chirality of Superhelices Self-Assembled from Polypeptide Mixtures

Regioselective and Homochiral Supramolecular Polymerization of Nanotadpole Aggremers of Poly(phenylacetylene) Derivatives

Stereodivergent Chirality Transfer by Noncovalent Control of Disulfide Bonds

Tunable Chirality of Self-Assembled Dipeptides Mediated by Bipyridine Derivative

Helical Structures with Switchable and Hierarchical Chirality