Abstract:Perceptual and Motor Skills, Ahead of Print. Collaborative recall by groups of people can evoke both memory detriments (e.g., collaborative inhibition) and benefits (e.g., error pruning and post-collaborative memory benefit). Yet, it remains indeterminate whether these effects are due to the emotional valence of stimuli and/or the specific subtypes of episodic memory tested (i.e., item memory and source memory), and whether they are related to the research procedure of directed forgetting (DF). We introduced item-method DF into collaborative memory research using a turn-taking procedure. The to-be-recalled words were studied in different emotional valences and were followed by either an R or F cue, which, respectively, instructed participants to remember or forget the words presented. We conducted two recall sessions (Recall 1 and Recall 2) that included the two subtypes of episodic memory. Recall 1 was performed either individually or collaboratively, while Recall 2 was always performed individually. We observed three major findings: (a) a collaborative memory decrement - collaborative inhibition - was minimally affected in both item memory and source memory tasks by either the emotional valence of the stimuli or the DF cue; (b) a collaborative memory benefit - error pruning of item memory - persisted within both ongoing and post-collaboration, while error pruning of source memory only presented in ongoing collaboration, thus demonstrating the relevance of dual-process models that differentiate automatic familiarity and effortful recollection processes; and (c) there was no post-collaborative memory benefit, indicating the importance of the type of collaborative procedure. We discuss these results in terms of various theories, including the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSDH) which asserts that memory strategies tend to be disrupted in collaboration but are facilitated within post-collaboration. Also, we describe the implications of these results and directions for exploring other influential factors in future research.

Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task

Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting

Dual-task Costs in Memory Recall Precision Reflect Shared Representational Space

The Detrimental and Beneficial Effects of Collaboration Are Sensitive to Both Collaborative Frequency and Collaborative Order but Not to the Encoding Task

Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations

Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory

Empirical factors affecting memory in collaborative versus nominal groups

Collaborative memory for categorized lists: ongoing and lasting effects are sensitive to episodic memory tasks

Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews

Collaborative Group Memory: Processes, Performance, and Techniques for Improvement

Collaborative memory in a serial combination procedure

How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: A two-stage framework

Differentiating the DF effect in episodic memory: evaluating the contribution of the procedures of collaborative memory

Examining the time course of post collaborative benefits across word lists and prose passages

Behavioral and brain synchronization differences between expert and novice teachers when collaborating with students

Interpersonal neural synchronization underlies mnemonic similarity during collaborative remembering

Recognition of Expertise and Perceived Influence in Intercultural Collaboration: A Study of Mixed American and Chinese Groups

“Going episodic”: collaborative inhibition and facilitation when long-married couples remember together