Abstract:It has been demonstrated that both part‐set cues and social interaction can produce detrimental effects on memory. Specifically, part‐set cues lead to part‐set cueing impairment, while social interaction can result in collaborative inhibition. However, there is less evidence on whether these factors have isolated or comparable impacts on memory. Additionally, it is still unknown whether the effects behave similarly on item memory and source memory, whether the effects are comparable between ongoing and post‐social collaboration, and whether stimulus features influence their respective roles. To address these issues, we conducted the current experiment where participants were exposed to gender stereotype‐consistent or ‐inconsistent words, categorized as positive, neutral, or negative. The words were read out by either a male or a female. Two recall sessions were conducted: Recall 1 was carried out either individually or collaboratively, whereas Recall 2 was always collaborative. Some participants performed Recall 1 under the part‐set cued condition while others were under the no‐cued condition. Both item memory and source memory were assessed in both recall sessions. The results have three implications. First, during the ongoing collaborative session, two effects were observed on item memory: part‐set cueing impairment and collaborative inhibition. Further, the contributions elicited by part‐set cues and social collaboration are isolated. The part‐set cueing impairment was influenced by both emotional valence and stereotypical consistency. Second, post‐collaboration analysis indicated that both the utilization of part‐set cues and collaboration itself enhanced item memory, resulting in the part‐set cueing enhancement and post‐collaborative memory benefit. Additionally, there was evidence indicating that the mechanisms prompted by these two factors intertwined when emotional valence and stereotypical consistency were considered. Third, in both ongoing and post‐collaboration scenarios, the detrimental and beneficial effects on item memory and source memory exhibited different patterns, thereby supporting the dual‐process models. These findings enhance our comprehension of the insolation and the interplay between part‐set cues and collaboration in memory.

Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews

Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions

Features of Successful and Unsuccessful Collaborative Memory Conversations in Long‐Married Couples

“Going episodic”: collaborative inhibition and facilitation when long-married couples remember together

Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews

Collaborative memory in a serial combination procedure

Benefits of collaborative remembering in older and younger couples: the role of conversation dynamics and gender.

Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting

Will your words become mine? Underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm.

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task

Forensic, clinical and everyday remembering: Exploring the role of perceived audience in changes across autobiographical memory recollections

Examining the time course of post collaborative benefits across word lists and prose passages

The Detrimental and Beneficial Effects of Collaboration Are Sensitive to Both Collaborative Frequency and Collaborative Order but Not to the Encoding Task

Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory

The isolation between part‐set cues and social collaboration in episodic memory is dependent: Insight from ongoing and post‐collaboration

Interpersonal neural synchronization underlies mnemonic similarity during collaborative remembering

Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations

Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research

Collaborative memory intervention in dementia: Caregiver participation matters