Abstract:Abstract Designing entirely new protein structures remains challenging because we do not fully understand the biophysical determinants of folding stability. Yet some protein folds are easier to design than others. Previous work identified the 43-residue αββα fold as especially challenging: the best designs had only a 2% success rate, compared to 39-87% success for other simple folds (1). This suggested the αββα fold would be a useful model system for gaining a deeper understanding of folding stability determinants and for testing new protein design methods. Here, we designed over ten thousand new αββα proteins and found over three thousand of them to fold into stable structures using a high-throughput protease-based assay. Nuclear magnetic resonance, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, circular dichroism, deep mutational scanning, and scrambled sequence control experiments indicated that our stable designs fold into their designed αββα structures with exceptional stability for their small size. Our large dataset enabled us to quantify the influence of universal stability determinants including nonpolar burial, helix capping, and buried unsatisfied polar atoms, as well as stability determinants unique to the αββα topology. Our work demonstrates how large-scale design and test cycles can solve challenging design problems while illuminating the biophysical determinants of folding. Significance Most computationally designed proteins fail to fold into their designed structures. This low success rate is a major obstacle to expanding the applications of protein design. In previous work, we discovered a small protein fold that was paradoxically challenging to design (only a 2% success rate) even though the fold itself is very simple. Here, we used a recently developed high-throughput approach to comprehensively examine the design rules for this simple fold. By designing over ten thousand proteins and experimentally measuring their folding stability, we discovered the key biophysical properties that determine the stability of these designs. Our results illustrate general lessons for protein design and also demonstrate how high-throughput stability studies can quantify the importance of different biophysical forces.

Why Do Proteins Look Like Proteins?

Emergence Of Preferred Structures In A Simple Model Of Protein Folding

Are Protein Folds Atypical?

Designability and Thermal Stability of Protein Structures

Simple Models of the Protein Folding Problem

What is the Origin of Those Common Structures of Protein-Model Chains?

Effect of Secondary Structure on the Conformations and Folding Behaviors of Protein-Like Chains

Designability, Thermodynamic Stability, And Dynamics In Protein Folding: A Lattice Model Study

Conformation Studies of Two-Dimensional Model Molecules of Proteins in the Process of Folding

Symmetry and Designability for Lattice Protein Models

Emergence of highly-designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model

The role of evolutionary selection in the dynamics of protein structure evolution

Properties and Origins of Protein Secondary Structure

The contact angle in inviscid fluid mechanics

Random Network Behaviour of Protein Structures

Dissecting the stability determinants of a challenging de novo protein fold using massively parallel design and experimentation

Secondary structure determines protein topology.

The Multiphase Halo of NGC 891: WIYN H-alpha and BVI Imaging

Building blocks of protein structures -- Physics meets Biology

Designability of Alpha-Helical Proteins.

Alpha helices are more evolutionarily robust to environmental perturbations than beta sheets: Bayesian learning and statistical mechanics to protein evolution