Abstract:Abstract Designing entirely new protein structures remains challenging because we do not fully understand the biophysical determinants of folding stability. Yet some protein folds are easier to design than others. Previous work identified the 43-residue αββα fold as especially challenging: the best designs had only a 2% success rate, compared to 39-87% success for other simple folds (1). This suggested the αββα fold would be a useful model system for gaining a deeper understanding of folding stability determinants and for testing new protein design methods. Here, we designed over ten thousand new αββα proteins and found over three thousand of them to fold into stable structures using a high-throughput protease-based assay. Nuclear magnetic resonance, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, circular dichroism, deep mutational scanning, and scrambled sequence control experiments indicated that our stable designs fold into their designed αββα structures with exceptional stability for their small size. Our large dataset enabled us to quantify the influence of universal stability determinants including nonpolar burial, helix capping, and buried unsatisfied polar atoms, as well as stability determinants unique to the αββα topology. Our work demonstrates how large-scale design and test cycles can solve challenging design problems while illuminating the biophysical determinants of folding. Significance Most computationally designed proteins fail to fold into their designed structures. This low success rate is a major obstacle to expanding the applications of protein design. In previous work, we discovered a small protein fold that was paradoxically challenging to design (only a 2% success rate) even though the fold itself is very simple. Here, we used a recently developed high-throughput approach to comprehensively examine the design rules for this simple fold. By designing over ten thousand proteins and experimentally measuring their folding stability, we discovered the key biophysical properties that determine the stability of these designs. Our results illustrate general lessons for protein design and also demonstrate how high-throughput stability studies can quantify the importance of different biophysical forces.

Designability of Alpha-Helical Proteins.

Designability and Thermal Stability of Protein Structures

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

Identifying Proteins of High Designability Via Surface-Exposure Patterns

Emergence Of Preferred Structures In A Simple Model Of Protein Folding

Flexibility of $Α$-Helices: Results of a Statistical Analysis of Database Protein Structures

De novo design of discrete, stable 310-helix peptide assemblies

Design of complicated all-α protein structures

Emergence of highly-designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model

AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold

Dissecting the stability determinants of a challenging de novo protein fold using massively parallel design and experimentation

The Designability of Protein Structures: A Lattice-Model Study using the Miyazawa-Jernigan Matrix

Mean-field HP Model, Designability and Alpha-Helices in Protein Structures.

Why Do Proteins Look Like Proteins?

Designability Of A Protein Chain In An Off-Lattice Heteropolymer Model

What is the Origin of Those Common Structures of Protein-Model Chains?

Networks of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions modulate the complex folding free energy surface of a designed βα protein

Are Protein Folds Atypical?

Protein design on computers. Five new proteins: Shpilka, Grendel, Fingerclasp, Leather, and Aida

Designing a structure-function alphabet of helix based on reduced amino acid clusters

De novo design of parallel and antiparallel A3B3 heterohexameric alpha-helical barrels