Comparing dielectric and plasmonic waveguides in a Mach–Zehnder architecture with coherent readout for sensing applications

Ana Sánchez-Ramírez,José Manuel Luque-González,J. Gonzalo Wangüemert-Pérez,Alejandro Ortega-Moñux,Íñigo Molina-Fernández

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109813

IF: 4.939

2024-01-01

Optics & Laser Technology

Abstract:Plasmonic waveguide biosensors are being studied for their potential benefits in a wide range of applications. Proponents of plasmonic biosensors often claim that they offer a more compact size and a stronger light-matter interaction than dielectric waveguide-based biosensors, thus leading to a higher sensitivity. However, so far, the performance of both types of biosensors has not been compared in terms of the minimum limit of detection they can actually offer. In this paper, plasmonic and dielectric-based photonic waveguide biosensors embedded in a coherent-readout interferometric architecture are fairly and rigorously compared. Both devices have been designed for the same commercial manufacturing platform, proving that dielectric waveguide-based biosensors exhibit a theoretical limit of detection about 18 times and 110 times lower for bulk and surface sensing, respectively, compared to plasmonic waveguide-based biosensors. It is demonstrated that these conclusions are also valid when the respective waveguides are embedded in resonant-type sensing architectures as those based on ring resonators.

optics,physics, applied