Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic, prescriptive, remedial Resource Roos program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October and again in May. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lover limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the Keydath and the California tests for the learning disabled population under study. (Author/SD) The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students Abstract Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Cali-Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic/prescriptive/ remedial Resource Room program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October 1972 and again in May 1973. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the KeyMath and the California for the learning disabled population under study. Various authors (Gronlund, 1971; Johnson and Myklebust, 1967; Jones, 1973; Lerner, 1971; Reisman, 1972) agree that diagnosis and evaluation should he available to students and should be used in planning an educational program for each individual. Included in the diagnosis should be both assessment of how the child learns (learning modalities, learning styles) and how much he has achieved in each of the academic areas. Evaluation should be continual so that program plans may be changed as necessary toward achieving whatever educational goals have been set. There is much writing to be found in learning disabilities literature that focuses on perceptual development, language development, and reading, but relatively little available on arithmetic disabilities and their diagnosis. The California Arithmetic Test (CAT) (Tiegs & Clark, 1963) has been widely used as an achievement measure. An advantage of this test has been the "Diagnostic Analysis of Learning Difficulties" which catagorizes the items and thus provides a g.oss approximation of strengths and weaknesses. This and other standardized measures provide questionable results when administered to children in special education programs if normative data on such groups have not been established. Even when data is available on samples of handicapped children, the lack of national agreement on definitive identifiable characteristics and the inconsistency in labeling of groups such as emotionally disturbed, brain injured, learning disabled, dyslexic, etc. make generalization of test data dubious. Although use of criterionreferenced rather than norm-referenced tests has been proposed (Prager & Mann, 1973), the need for norm-referenced data to determine large scale program accountability in the public schools makes the rejection of norm-referenced measures unlikely. There is need for instruments that provide maximum achievement and diagnostic data and that can be administered by regular school personnel with a minimum of training. The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test (Connolly, Natchman, & Pritchett, 1971) offers an alternative to the CAT.

Test Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis

Are separate room test accommodations effective for college students with disabilities?

Standardized Assessment Accommodations for Individuals with Intellectual Disability

Exploring the Appropriateness of Test Accommodations for Chinese University Students with Hearing Impairment

Assessment Accommodations for English Language Learners: Implications for Policy-Based Empirical Research

Consensus or contradiction? A review of the current research into the impact of granting extra time in exams to students with specific learning difficulties (SpLD)

Students With Learning Disabilities in Higher Education: Faculty Attitude and Practices

Accommodations for disabilities in dental education: A focus on technical standards and clinical skills

Test length and cognitive fatigue: An empirical examination of effects on performance and test-taker reactions.

Using a Diagnostic OSCE to Discern Deficit From Disability in Struggling Students

How Principals Decide Which Students With Disability Sit Standardised Tests and the Implications for School Accountability

Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

Examining College Student Attitudes Toward Individuals with Disabilities: Implications for College Adaptive Sports Development

Do working memory capacity and test anxiety modulate the beneficial effects of testing on new learning?

Investigating the Validity Issue of Extended Time for Students with Blindness in Tests Involving Complex Tables

Perceptions of Academic Strategies and Competence in Students with Learning Disabilities

Improving Test-Taking Effort in Low-Stakes Group-Based Educational Testing: A Meta-Analysis of Interventions

Measurement precision and user experience with adaptive versus non-adaptive psychometric tests

The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students

User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations

A Comparison of Two Methods of Administering Group Reading Inventories to Diverse Learners