Abstract:THEORY: Models on pre-assessment learning effects confirmed that task demands stand out among the factors assessors can modify in an assessment to influence learning. However, little is known about which tasks in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) improve students' cognitive and metacognitive processes. Research is needed to support OSCE designs that benefit students' metacognitive strategies when they are studying, reinforcing a hypothesis-driven approach. With that intent, hypothesis-driven physical examination (HDPE) assessments ask students to elicit and interpret findings of the physical exam to reach a diagnosis ("Examine this patient with a painful shoulder to reach a diagnosis").HYPOTHESES: When studying for HDPE, students will dedicate more time to hypothesis-driven discussions and practice than when studying for a part-task OSCE ("Perform the shoulder exam"). It is expected that the whole-task nature of HDPE will lead to a hypothesis-oriented use of the learning resources, a frequent use of adjustment strategies, and persistence with learning.METHOD: In a mixed-methods study, 40 medical students were randomly paired and filmed while studying together for two hypothetical OSCE stations. Each 25-min study period began with video cues asking to study for either a part-task OSCE or an HDPE. In a crossover design, sequences were randomized for OSCEs and contents (shoulder or spine). Time-on-task for discussions or practice were categorized as "hypothesis-driven" or "sequence of signs and maneuvers." Content analysis of focus group interviews summarized students' perception of learning resources, adjustment strategies, and persistence with learning.RESULTS: When studying for HDPE, students allocate significantly more time for hypothesis-driven discussions and practice. Students use resources contrasting diagnoses and report persistence with learning. When studying for part-task OSCEs, time-on-task is reversed, spent on rehearsing a sequence of signs and maneuvers.CONCLUSIONS: OSCEs with similar contents but different task demands lead to opposite learning strategies regarding how students manage their study time. Measuring pre-assessment effects from a metacognitive perspective provides empirical evidence to redesign assessments for learning.

Consensus or contradiction? A review of the current research into the impact of granting extra time in exams to students with specific learning difficulties (SpLD)

The Implementation of Extended Examination Duration for Students With ADHD in Higher Education

Test Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis

Working Memory Resources Depletion Makes Delayed Testing Beneficial

How Principals Decide Which Students With Disability Sit Standardised Tests and the Implications for School Accountability

Students With Learning Disabilities in Higher Education: Faculty Attitude and Practices

Are separate room test accommodations effective for college students with disabilities?

Extending Cognitive Load Theory to Incorporate Working Memory Resource Depletion: Evidence from the Spacing Effect

The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities

Perceptions of Academic Strategies and Competence in Students with Learning Disabilities

Does Timed Testing Affect the Interpretation of Efficiency Scores?—A GLMM Analysis of Reading Components

Cognitive Load Theory, Resource Depletion and the Delayed Testing Effect

Enhanced detection of suboptimal effort in psychoeducational assessments for dyslexia

Students With Learning Disabilities: Homework Problems and Promising Practices

A large-scale examination of the effectiveness of anonymous marking in reducing group performance differences in higher education assessment

An Evaluation of Asynchronous Online Discussion Board Formats in Interteaching

Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfaction

Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

Task Demands in OSCEs Influence Learning Strategies

Inter-school variations in the standard of examiners' graduation-level OSCE judgements