Enhancing Specific Health Literacy with a Digital Evidence-Based Patient Decision Aid for Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kai Wehkamp,Felicia Beatrice Kiefer,Friedemann Geiger,Fueloep Scheibler,Jens Ulrich Rueffer,Norbert Donner-Banzhoff,Cornelia Betsch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S311470
2021-06-14
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Kai Wehkamp, 1– 3, * Felicia Beatrice Kiefer, 4, * Friedemann Geiger, 1, 5 Fueloep Scheibler, 1 Jens Ulrich Rueffer, 6 Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, 7 Cornelia Betsch 4 1 Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; 2 Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; 3 Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; 4 Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany; 5 Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; 6 Take Part Media & Science GmbH, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany; 7 Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Kai Wehkamp Department of Internal Medicine I, Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany Tel +49 (0)431-500-0 Email Introduction: Health literacy is an important competency to make informed, shared decisions in line with patient's preferences. On the other hand, lower health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes. Evidence-based patient decision aids (EbPDA) are validated instruments to support informed medical decisions and empower patients for relevant involvement in their care. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a digital EbPDA for hypertension on health literacy. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 124 participants were presented with a web-based scenario related to a newly diagnosed condition of arterial hypertension. The intervention group was provided with an online decision aid, while the control group was prompted to search for related information without support. Specific health literacy for hypertension was operationalized based on the European survey for health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47). Results: The intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in subjectively perceived overall specific health literacy regarding hypertension (p=0.02, Cohen's d=0.44). The effect was also statistically significant for the subcategories understanding, appraising, and applying health-related information (all p< 0.05). At least equal results could be shown for participants with a lower level of education compared to participants with a high level. Conclusion: The findings suggest that digital EbPDAs can be an effective and easily scalable instrument to improve populations' specific health literacy. A possible advantage of the measure could be that patients are addressed concerning important and pressing personal decisions, fostering awareness of the individual's need for health literacy to reflect one's options and preferences. EbPDAs may also be a promising approach to target vulnerable populations, as the investigated EbPDA seems to perform equally in less versus more educated individuals. For future research, it may be interesting to investigate whether EbPDAs have effects on general health literacy that go beyond the disease specifically addressed. Keywords: shared decision-making, decision aids, health literacy, equity, preferences Patient engagement and patient participation in the medical decision-making process depend on the health practitioner's efforts to respect and integrate the patient's preferences and – particularly – on the patient's capacity and motivation to understand and consider different medical options and consequences. 1 , 2 Thus, patients' empowerment in terms of general and specific health literacy is an essential goal of health communication and crucial to making relevant "healthy" decisions. 3 Shared-decision making (SDM) is the widely accepted standard for supporting good decisions: it integrates medical evidence, clinical experience, and the patient's preferences. 4 The improvement of patient's health literacy is an important foundation of improving SDM: general health literacy is of avail to gain disease-specific information, to pose relevant questions, and thus to engage in the decision-making process. 5–9 On the other hand, improving health literacy is often an effect – if not a purpose – of interventions that foster shared decision-making. 10 Ultimately, SDM-related skills are -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal