Abstract:OBJECTIVES:Endovascular treatment (EVT) is an alternative method used to treat isolated dissection of the celiac artery (IDCA). However, only a few mid-term results have been reported. This study aimed to analyze and compare the outcomes of endovascular and non-operative therapies for IDCA.METHODS:Data from a cohort of consecutive IDCA patients enrolled in the study hospital between April 2012 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, imaging features, treatment modalities, and follow-up results of celiac artery remodeling and adverse events were collected and analyzed.RESULTS:A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study. Stents were deployed in 68 patients, and non-operative treatment (blood pressure control and pain management) was continued in the remaining 19 patients who did not receive stenting; among these 19 patients, EVT failed in 6. The mean follow-up period was 37.3 (range, 10-85 months) and 44.0 (range, 9-80 months) months in the EVT and non-operative groups, respectively. During follow-up, the overall complete remodeling (absence of residual dissection with no false lumen or no intramural thrombus) rate was significantly higher in the EVT group than in the non-operative group (87.3% vs 7.1%, p<0.001). The incomplete remodeling (improved true lumen with malabsorption or partial thrombosis of the false lumen) rate was not significantly different between the EVT and non-operative groups (6.3% vs 14.3%; p=0.2984). Meanwhile, the adverse event-free survival rates were 89.0%, 67.0%, and 67.0% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, in the EVT group compared with 39.7% and 29.8% at 1 and 3 years in the non-operative group (p<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS:EVT for IDCA may be considered an effective management option with a favorable clinical success rate, an encouraging complete remodeling rate, and a satisfactory adverse event-free survival rate. However, further evaluation with a long-term follow-up is required.CLINICAL IMPACT:Endovascular intervention for isolated dissection of the celiac artery has attracted inadequate attention. In this retrospective study with comparative analysis of endovascular versus conservative therapy for isolated dissection of the celiac artery patients, a better complete remodeling rate and a higher adverse event-free survival rate were observed in the endovascular treatment (EVT) group during follow-up, indicating that EVT could be an effective management option for isolated dissection of the celiac artery.

Endovascular Revascularization versus Open Surgical Revascularization as the First Strategy for Arterial Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Results after intraoperative open and endovascular revascularization of acute mesenteric ischemia requiring a laparotomy

Mid-term Results of the Treatment of Isolated Dissection of the Celiac Artery: A Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Versus Conservative Therapy.

Comparing endovascular revascularization to open surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Versus Open Revascularization for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Meta-analysis

Endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical revascularization for patients with lower extremity artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgery for the Treatment of Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Embolism: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Endovascular Therapy and Open Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion: A Large-Scale Analysis Based on the JROAD-DPC Database

An endovascular- vs. a surgery-first revascularization strategy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract 16054: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Therapy versus Surgical Revascularization for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endovascular Revascularization with Stent Implantation in Patients with Acute Mesenteric Ischemia due to Acute Arterial Thrombosis: Clinical Outcome and Predictive Factors

Revascularization-first strategy versus central repair-first strategy for acute type A aortic dissection complicated with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A meta-analysis

Impact of Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization on Short-Term and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Endovascular revascularisation versus surgical revascularisation in patients with lower limb atherosclerosis obliterans: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and meta-regression

Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis

Outcomes after open and endovascular treatment for mesenteric artery embolism patients: a retrospective inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis

Endovascular Revascularization as Primary Treatment for Acute Embolic Mesenteric Ischemia: Stent Thrombectomy plus Aspiration versus Aspiration Alone

Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system

Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with distal medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Bypass and Endovascular Revascularisation for Peripheral Artery Disease