Regarding “morphologic Findings and Management Strategy of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Celiac Artery”
Shaoqin Li,Zhongzhi Jia,Guomin Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.097
IF: 4.86
2016-01-01
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:We read with great interest the recent article by Sun et al.1Sun J. Li D.L. Wu Z.H. He Y.Y. Zhu Q.Q. Zhang H.K. Morphologic findings and management strategy of spontaneous isolated dissection of the celiac artery.J Vasc Surg. 2016; 64: 389-394Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar The authors concluded that medical treatment can be used in stable patients (type I, IIa, IIIa, IVa); that endovascular therapy can be used in patients with recurrent symptoms, visceral malperfusion (type IIb, IIIb, IVb), or aneurysms (type V); and that open surgery should be considered if endovascular repair is not suitable or has failed. However, the authors did not exactly define the term stable, specifically whether they are referring to stable symptoms or a stable dissection. Also, the authors did not define the exact criterion to define “visceral malperfusion,” nor did they define the characteristic diameter of the aneurysm that would mandate intervention. We fear that their recommendations might lead to the abuse of stent placement if every patient with visceral malperfusion or an aneurysm received endovascular therapy because initial conservative treatment is adequate for 79% of cases of spontaneous isolated dissection of the celiac artery according to a recent systematic literature review.2Cavalcante R.N. Motta-Leal-Filho J.M. De Fina B. Galastri F.L. Affonso B.B. de Amorim J.E. et al.Systematic literature review on evaluation and management of isolated spontaneous celiac trunk dissection.Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 34: 274-279Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar In addition, it was not clear what the authors meant by failure of endovascular repair, whether this referred to clinical failure or technical failure. Finally, it might be more appropriately stated that open surgery should be considered for patients with persistence or recurrence of symptoms after endovascular treatments as well as for patients with arterial rupture or organ necrosis. A look at the future of vascular surgeryJournal of Vascular SurgeryVol. 64Issue 4PreviewI would first like to thank Dr Perler and the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) for the singular honor of giving the Eleventh John Homans Lecture. This list of previous Homans lecturers shows why I am humbled by this invitation (Table I). Men like Elkin, Fontaine, Crafoord, Kirklin, Linton, DeBakey, Crawford, Thompson, Hollier, and Moore are the superstars of our specialty. So I am deeply indebted to Bruce Perler for adding me—a maverick from the Bronx—to this list. Full-Text PDF Open Archive