Abstract:Individuals often preferentially avoid information that contradicts and seek information that aligns with their prior beliefs-a tendency referred to as "selective exposure." Traditionally, prior research has focused on intrapersonal drivers of selective exposure, including avoidance of cognitive dissonance. We take a complementary approach by investigating the conditions under which interpersonal concerns drive selective exposure. Drawing on a large literature on impression management, we test a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (a) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (b) observers reward such shifts. We test this model in the domain of partisan politics in the United States across five financially incentivized, preregistered experiments (N = 3,598). Our results extend prior theory by identifying three key contingencies: the type of task on which observers expect to collaborate with actors, alignment of group membership between observers and actors, and the magnitude of demonstrated selective exposure. Overall, we find that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically predictable conditions. Our work also identifies an actor-observer misalignment: While observers are sensitive to the type of future interaction with an actor, the actors themselves do not intuit this sensitivity. In the era of social media, when information selection decisions are more public than ever and the spread of misinformation is pervasive, understanding the ways in which reputational considerations shape decision making not only illuminates why selective exposure persists, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

When Outsiders Step In: Investigating the Phenomenon of Reputational Support

Intensifying Social Exchange Relationships in Public Organizations: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

How Organizational Socialization Tactics Affect Volunteer Outcomes for New Volunteers

Investigating Membership Retention: Employing Public Relations Theory to Better Understand Relationship Management

Repaying the Debt: An Examination of the Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior by Low Performers

Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory

Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment.

The Role of Formal Third-Party Endorsements and Informal Self-Proclaiming Signals in Nonprofit Reputation Building

The Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Individual Change Readiness

When Self-View Is at Stake: Responses to Ostracism Through the Lens of Self-Verification Theory

Scrutinizing Social Identity Theory in Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experimental Investigation

Perceived Organizational Support: Why Caring About Employees Counts

Does Felt Obligation or Gratitude Better Explain the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Outcomes?

Does organizational support promote citizenship in service settings? The moderating role of service climate

Muting or Meddling? Advocacy as a Relational Communication Strategy Affecting Organization–Public Relationships and Stakeholder Response

Revisiting How and when Perceived Organizational Support Enhances Taking Charge

The interplay between perceived support and proactive personality: Effects on self-verification perceptions and emotions

Context and social exchange: perceived ethical climate strengthens the relationships between perceived organizational support and organizational identification and commitment

Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.