Abstract:Statistical inference under order restrictions is an important field in statistical science and has been studied and practiced widely. The utilization of the assumption of monotonicity increases the efficiency of statistical inference procedures. This can be found in the literature such as Ayer, Brunk, Ewing, Reid and Silverman (1955), Robertson and Wright (1974), Barlow and Ub- haya (1971), Lee (1981), Kelly (1989), Korn (1982), Schoenfeld (1986), Hayter (1990) and Lee (1996). In Chapter 2, we review some fundamental theories about the order restricted statistical inference including isotonic regression and test of a simply ordered hypothesis. -- In Chapter 3, we study a max-min interval procedure, a modification of Tukey's studentized range technique, to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for pairwise comparisons of response means by utilizing the prior knowledge of the monotonicity of the means. The improvement of the proposed max-min interval procedure is substantial. -- The one-sided simultaneous confidence lower bound is studied in Chapter 4. We investigate the incomplete optimization problem of maximizing simultaneous lower bounds for nonnegative contrasts considered by Marcus (1978). Significant improvements over Marcus' (1978) results, including a necessary and sufficient condition for the optimal solution and an efficient computation algorithm to compute the optimal lower bounds, are made. -- In Chapter 5, we introduce a one-sided multiple comparison test (OMCT) for testing the homogeneity of the means against the simple order alternative. It gives sharper one-sided simultaneous confidence lower bounds. This OMCT approach compares favorably with Hayter's (1990) and Marcus' (1978) approaches and it may be comparable to the least significant difference approach. -- The simultaneous statistical inference for response means with a control is considered in Chapter 6. An orthant test statistic is introduced. With the prior knowledge that the response means are monotone, a more efficient simultaneous confidence lower bound can be inverted from this test to detect the difference between response means and the control mean. An algorithm to compute the optimal lower bound is included. -- In Chapter 7, we demonstrate that the stepwise test procedure based on likelihood ratio test is a more efficient test procedure for detecting the minimum efficient dose in dose-response studies.

Step-down trend tests for identifying the minimum effective dose

Sequential Continual Reassessment Method for Two-Dimensional Dose Finding.

Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

A Bayesian Quasi-Likelihood Design for Identifying the Minimum Effective Dose and Maximum Utility Dose in Dose-Ranging Studies

A versatile trend test for the evaluation of tumor incidences in long-term carcinogenicity bioassays

Tests for strict monotonic trend in bio-medical dose-response relationships (respective concentration-response or exposure-response relationships) -- a biostatistical perspective

Adaptive Contrast Test for Dose-Response Studies and Modeling

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

Simultaneous Statistical Inference for Monotone Dose-Response Means

Claiming trend in toxicological and pharmacological dose-response studies: an overview on statistical methods and related R-Software

Sample size calculation in dose-response research

Seamless Phase II/III Design: a Useful Strategy to Reduce the Sample Size for Dose Optimization

Statistical Approach to Identify Threshold and Point of Departure in Dose-Response Data

A New Multiple Testing Method in the Dependent Case

Simultaneous confidence bounds in monotone dose–response studies

Optimal Approximate Designs for Comparison with Control in Dose-Escalation Studies

Detection of treatment effects by covariate-adjusted expected shortfall

Robust multiple comparisons against a control group with application in toxicology

Semi-parametric Benchmark Dose Analysis with Monotone Additive Models

Max–min Multiple Comparison Procedure for Isotonic Dose–response Curves

A practical Bayesian design to identify the maximum tolerated dose contour for drug combination trials