Abstract:Abstract Background and objectives: Motivated from a study on breast cancer, we consider the problem of evaluating a statistical hypothesis when some model characteristics are potentially non or weakly identifiable from observed data. Such scenarios are common in longitudinal studies for evaluating a covariate effect when dropouts may be informative. The hypothesis related to treatment effects may not be testable nonparametrically, with untestable model restrictions necessary for inference. A popular approach is to assume a finite dimensional model and to fix a minimal set of parameters, called sensitivity parameters, conditional upon which hypothesized parameters are assumed identifiable. These profile models, viewed as a functional of the secondary or sensitivity parameters, form the basis of sensitivity analysis. In the current literature, however, inference regarding significance of the covariates is ad hoc, ignoring that multiple tests are conducted and that the working model may be misspecified. Methods and results: In this paper, we propose conservatively testing the null hypothesis of interest across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic. The test must account for the facts that inferences are carried out simultaneously across the entire range of the sensitivity parameters and that the model may be misspecified under certain values of the sensitivity parameters, as might occur if a nonignorable model is fit, when, in reality, missingness is ignorable. We characterize the limiting distribution of the statistic as a functional of processes in the sensitivity parameters, which involves a careful theoretical analysis of its behavior under model misspecification. In practice, we suggest a simple yet flexible resampling procedure to implement the infimum test as well as to construct confidence bands for simultaneous pointwise tests across all values of the sensitivity parameters. The methodology's practical utility is illustrated in simulations and an analysis of quality-of-life outcomes from a longitudinal study on breast cancer. Interestingly in this example, a covariate effect on cancer outcomes is detected over a wide range of the sensitivity parameter when a Wald test that assumes identifiability fails. Implications and next steps: The key implication of this work is that the hypothesis of interest can be conservatively evaluated across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic over the space of these parameters. A key assumption of this paper is that the working model is finite dimensional although the full specification of distribution of the data is not required. The methodology should be broadly applicable to infinite dimensional models, such as survival models for censored data. This extension is the focus of current research work. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A6.

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

Non-parametric Tests for the Tail Equivalence Via Empirical Likelihood

Simultaneous Statistical Inference for Monotone Dose-Response Means

Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

Using a monotonic density ratio model to increase the power of the goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with case-control data

A Shrinkage Method for Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium in Case‐Control Studies

A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations

Testing against ordered alternatives in one-way ANOVA model with exponential errors

Abstract A6: A Global Sensitivity Test for Evaluating Hypotheses with Non- and Weakly Identifiable Statistical Models: an Application to Breast Cancer Outcomes

Testing homogeneity of proportions from sparse binomial data with a large number of groups

A new class of robust two-sample Wald-type tests

A bootstrap semiparametric homogeneity test for the distributions of multigroup proportional data, with applications to analysis of quality of life outcomes in clinical trials

New multivariate tests for assessing covariate balance in matched observational studies

Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost

Likelihood-ratio test statistic for the finite-sample case in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

Nonparametric covariate hypothesis tests for the cure rate in mixture cure models

Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

Approximative Tests for the Equality of Two Cumulative Incidence Functions of a Competing Risk

Intrinsic tests for the equality of two correlated proportions