Abstract:Background The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two‐sample summary‐data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's Q statistic method, developed for meta‐analysis. However, Cochran's Q statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's Q statistic with exact weighting (Qmin ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies. Method The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a p value can be calculated. We use the minimum p value for these eigenvector‐based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's Q statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition. Results Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's Q statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR‐PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that Qmin does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi‐square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso. Conclusions Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.

New multivariate tests for assessing covariate balance in matched observational studies

Graph-Based Tests for Multivariate Covariate Balance Under Multi-Valued Treatments

Covariate Balance in Simple, Stratified and Clustered Comparative Studies

Assessing Covariate Balance with Small Sample Sizes

Balance Diagnostics after Propensity Score Matching.

Randomization Tests that Condition on Non-Categorical Covariate Balance

Evaluation and comparison of covariate balance metrics in studies with time-dependent confounding

Testing Biased Randomization Assumptions and Quantifying Imperfect Matching and Residual Confounding in Matched Observational Studies

Permutation Tests for Assessing Potential Non-Linear Associations between Treatment Use and Multivariate Clinical Outcomes

Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity in observational studies

Kernel-Distance-Based Covariate Balancing

Exact Multivariate Tests - A New Effective Principle of Controlled Model Choice

A Sequential Significance Test for Treatment by Covariate Interactions

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

Robust Tests for Treatment Effect in Survival Analysis under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization

A New and Unified Family of Covariate Adaptive Randomization Procedures and Their Properties

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Multivariate nonparametric methods in two-way balanced designs: performances and limitations in small samples

Interaction tests with covariate-adaptive randomization