The TIE‐93 : a cross‐cultural facial emotion recognition assessment adapted for multicultural Alzheimer’s dementia patients

Renelle Bourdage,Sanne Franzen,Janne M. Papma,Juliette Palisson,Charlotte Joy,Béatrice Garcin,Pauline Narme
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.079081
2023-12-01
Abstract:Abstract Background Facial emotion recognition testing in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia has been recently identified as essential for early detection and differential diagnostics (García‐Casal et al., 2019; Strijkert et al., 2022). However, experts in neuropsychology identified that emotion recognition remains one of the most difficult domains to assess in culturally diverse populations due to a lack of culturally adapted tools (Franzen et al., 2021). To address this resource gap, this study validated a cross‐cultural test for emotion recognition; the TIE‐93. Method Fifty‐six patients with AD and 240 healthy controls (aged 60 years and older), from French and multicultural backgrounds, were included in the study. The TIE‐93 is composed of eight panels with six photos of actors displaying six different emotions (happiness, anger, disgust, fear, sadness and neutral). The participant is given a scenario with an emotion cue and are asked to identify which of the six emotions displayed matches the scenario. Result In healthy controls, analyses showed a negative correlation between performance and age (r = ‐.15, p<.05), and a positive correlation with education level (r = .4, p<.001). Given the difference in education level between French and multicultural participants, comparisons were made within cultures. Multicultural AD patients (n = 23) were compared to multicultural controls (n = 148) using an ANCOVA with education as a covariate. A significant effect was found for diagnosis (F(1, 168) = 6.6; p<0.01), with lower scores in AD patients compared to controls, as well as a significant emotion x diagnosis interaction (F(1, 168) = 5; p<0.05). The intergroup effect was significant only for disgust (p<0.001), fear (p<0.05) and anger (p<0.01). French AD patients (n = 33) were compared to French controls (n = 93) using an ANOVA, as education did not differ between groups. Results showed a significant effect for diagnosis (F(1, 123) = 10.3; p<0.005) with a non‐significant emotion x diagnosis interaction (F(1, 123) = 3.1; p = 0.08). However, the diagnosis effect was significant for all emotions except happiness: disgust (p<0.05), sadness (p<0.01), neutral (p<0.05), fear (p = 0.005), anger (p<0.05). Conclusion The TIE‐93 seems valid for assessing facial emotion recognition in multicultural populations, demonstrating a decline in facial emotion recognition in patients with AD as compared to healthy controls.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?