Abstract:Abstract Introduction: More precise subtyping within dementia syndromes leads to better prediction of pathology, supporting individualized, disease-specific treatments. Notably, studies highlight that identification of the right-temporal or semantic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (sbvFTD) subtype relies in part on measuring emotion recognition abilities. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of current tools, we compared two dynamic video-based affect labeling tests - the Dynamic Affect Recognition Test (DART) and The Awareness of Social Inference Test-Emotion Evaluation Test (TASIT-EET) - against the static image-based Name Affect subtest of the Comprehensive Affect Testing System (CATS-NA) test. A total of 555 persons with dementia (PwD), in the early stages of neurodegenerative disease (Clinical Dementia Rating <= 1; Mini Mental State Examination > 20), diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndrome (AD) (n=154), progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPS) (n=88), non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) (n=77), semantic variant PPA (n=53), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n=124), semantic bvFTD (n=65), and 133 healthy older participants underwent emotion testing and structural MRI. Results: All emotion labeling tests differentiated PwD from healthy controls (DART, AUC=0.81; TASIT-EET, AUC=0.84; CATS-NA, AUC=0.72), and FTD with social cognition deficits (sbvFTD, bvFTD, and svPPA) from other PwDs (DART, AUC=0.64; TASIT-EET, AUC=0.66; CATS-NA, AUC=0.63). Dynamic tests outperformed CATS-NA in differentiating sbvFTD from bvFTD and svPPA (DART, AUC=0.79; TASIT-EET, AUC=0.74; CATS-NA, AUC=0.60), whereas DART outperformed TASIT-EET in differentiating sbvFTD from svPPA (DART, AUC=0.73; TASIT-EET, AUC=0.66). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that TASIT-EET performance was predicted by visual memory (Benson-delayed) and verbal semantic (BNT, Animal Fluency) functions (p<0.01) and CATS-NA performance was predicted by visuospatial (CATS-Face matching, Number location) (p<0.001) and executive functions (Modified Trail making speed) (p<0.05), while DART was predicted by only working memory functions (Digit span backward) (p<0.05). DART corresponded to the expected structural anatomy of emotion, including right predominant insula, anterior temporal, and orbitofrontal lobes. While both TASIT-EET and CATS-NA shared that pattern of brain anatomy, TASIT-EET correlated with more left temporal structures than DART, and CATS-NA associated with more dorsal structures than DART. Finally, all emotion labeling tests correlated with real-life empathy deficits measured by a standardized informant-based survey. Conclusion: Tasks showing dynamic audio-visual emotion displays showed better effectiveness for diagnostic differentiation of FTD syndromes than static image-based tasks, and the DART showed better clinical and anatomic precision than the TASIT-EET. Emotion identification deficits are a core feature of dementia syndromes like sbvFTD, but occur in the context of additional cognitive deficits. Therefore, careful selection of tests that reflect the key underlying neural circuits related to emotion, and which minimize demand from other cognitive domains, will result in more accurate diagnoses.

COMPARING THE VALUE OF DYNAMIC VS. STATIC-IMAGE-BASED TESTS OF EMOTION RECOGNITION IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES

Comparing two facets of emotion perception across multiple neurodegenerative diseases

The functional neuroanatomy of emotion processing in frontotemporal dementias

Perception of emotion on faces in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study

Exploring Emotion and Emotional Variability as DigitalBiomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia Speech

A common marker of affect recognition dysfunction in the FTD spectrum of disorders

RECOGNITION OF EMOTIONS FROM VOICE IN MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE DEMENTIA

Emotion recognition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a dynamic environment

Emotion Detection Deficits and Decreased Empathy in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease Affect Caregiver Mood and Burden

Apathy, Executive Function, and Emotion Recognition Are the Main Drivers of Functional Impairment in Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia

Facial Emotion Recognition in Older Adults With Cognitive Complaints

Diagnostic Performance of Socio-Emotional Informant-Based Questionnaires for the Clinical Detection of the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia

Automated analysis of facial emotions in subjects with cognitive impairment

Affective and cognitive theory of mind in Alzheimer’s disease: The role of executive functions

Functional dissociation between anterior temporal lobe and inferior frontal gyrus in the processing of dynamic body expressions: Insights from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Social Cognition Deficits: The Key to Discriminate Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer's Disease Regardless of Amnesia?

Emotional prosody recognition is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease

Distinct neural systems underlying reduced emotional enhancement for positive and negative stimuli in early Alzheimer's disease

Multidimensional measures of person knowledge and spatial associative learning: can these be applied to the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal and vascular dementia?

Early Detection and Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Depression with Neuropsychological Tasks

Automated free speech analysis reveals distinct markers of Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia