Abstract:Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) DNA and matched plasma-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) demonstrated excellent correlations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML),1-4 and dynamic ctDNA monitoring contributes to predict relapse in MDS and AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).5 However, few researches are reported on the application of ctDNA dynamic monitoring assessments during the whole disease course in MDS and AML.1 Here, we assessed the feasibility and utility of ctDNA as a novel and minimally invasive biomarker based on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to monitor treatment outcome, track clonal evolution and predict survival. To the best of our knowledge, we firstly demonstrated the application of ctDNA concentration as an effective prognostic biomarker in MDS and AML. The details of clinical data and methods are shown in Tables S1–S3. Thirty-five adult patients were involved in our study. Twenty-seven patients had pre- and post-treatment plasma-derived ctDNA, and paired baseline BM DNA NGS assessments were included for both concordance analysis and dynamic ctDNA analysis. Four patients with only baseline BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA NGS assessments were used for concordance analysis. Three patients with only pre- and post-treatment ctDNA assessments and one patient with only post-treatment ctDNA assessments were used for dynamic ctDNA analysis (Figure 1). A total of 46 mutated genes with 135 mutations were detected in BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA, involving 42 genes with 100 mutations (74.1%) detected both in BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA (Figure 2A, Figure S1). Among the 100 concordant mutations, the concordance of variant allele frequencies (VAFs) assessment based on plasma and BM was high (R = .854 p < .001) (Figure 2B). Comparing pre-treatment mean ctDNA concentrations with blasts in BM at baseline measured by cytological analysis, we found pre-treatment mean ctDNA concentrations were strongly associated with BM blasts at baseline (R = .618, p < .001) (Figure 2C), indicating mean ctDNA concentration were related to tumour burden. We also reached a moderate correlation between pre-treatment mean ctDNA VAF and BM blasts (R = .533, p = .001) (Figure S2). For patients with pre- and post-treatment paired samples, dynamic change of VAFs was analyzed. Patients were segregated into three groups, including those achieved a complete response (CR), those with CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) (for AML), morphologic CR (mCR) (for MDS)/morphologic leukaemia-free state (mLFS) (for AML) or stable disease (SD) (for MDS) and those with progressive disease (PD). Sixteen patients with CR had dramatically decreased VAFs (median VAF, 16.7% pre-treatment vs. 0% post-treatment, p < .001). Persistent VAFs were observed in CRi, mCR, mLFS and SD patients (median VAF, 3.6% pre-treatment vs. 3.3% post-treatment, p = .804). VAFs from PD patients tended to increase (median VAF, 4.7% pre-treatment vs. 6.7% post-treatment, p = .053) (Figure 2D). The post-treatment VAFs were lower in patients with CR versus those without CR (median VAF, 0% vs. 3.7%, p < .001) (Figure S3A). Similarly, delta VAFs from pre-treatment to post-treatment were greater in patients with CR versus those without CR (median delta VAF, 12.8% vs. −.3%, p < .001) (Figure S3B). As expected, post-treatment ctDNA positivity was associated with both shorter progression-free survival (PFS, median PFS, 5.6 vs. not reached [NR] months, p < .001) (Figure 3A) and overall survival (OS, median OS, 11.0 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3B). In the meantime, increased mean ctDNA VAF (defined as increasing post-treatment compared with pre-treatment ctDNA VAF) predicted decreased PFS (median PFS, 2.8 vs. 25.0 months, p < .001) (Figure 3C) and OS (median OS, 8.1 vs. 16.8 months, p = .014) (Figure 3D). Furthermore, we discovered patients with increased mean ctDNA concentration have poorer PFS (median PFS, 2.8 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3E) and OS (median OS, 7.9 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3F). However, the significant prognostic impact of pre-treatment ctDNA status on PFS and OS with mean ctDNA VAF (Figure S4A,B) or mean ctDNA concentration (Figure S4C and D) was not discovered, indicating pre-treatment ctDNA status was not a good biomarker to stratify the prognosis. To investigate the prognostic differences between mean ctDNA VAF and mean ctDNA concentration change from post- to pre-treatment, we compared the discrimination ability of the prognostic model with the concordance index (C-index). The model based on mean ctDNA concentration change showed better discrimination of PFS with C-index value of .79, compared to mean ctDNA VAF with C-index value of .75. The area under curve (AUC) for predicting 1-year PFS indicated more excellent conformity based on ctDNA concentration change, compared to mean ctDNA VAF (AUC, .84 vs. .82) (Figure 3G). Similarity was also discovered in OS analysis (C-index, .70 vs. .67; AUC, .78 vs. .72) (Figure 3H). Next, we tried to explore clonal evolution patterns in refractory or relapsed MDS and AML. We observed two patterns of progression from MDS to secondary AML (sAML). Patient 1 (P1) showed a linear pattern, where successive clones occurred within the previous parental clone. The acquisition of FLT3 mutation occurred during disease relapse and subsequently transformation to AML (Figure 4A). P7 and P8 showed a branched pattern (Figure 4B, Figure S5A, respectively). For P7, the original clone harboring PTPN11 mutation was suppressed while a new clone carrying FLT3-ITD mutation expanded, leading to AML transformation. However, we only discovered one linear pattern in refractory or relapsed AML. Three representative patients (P11, P26 and P35) achieved CR and relapsed within 6−7 months (Figure 4C, Figure S5B,C, respectively). The founding clone in the primary tumour in P11 contained mutations in WT1, GATA2 and RAD21 that were all recurrent at relapse. A new subclone occurred and evolved to become the dominant clone at relapse by acquiring additional SETD2 mutations. Compared with flow cytometry measurable residue disease results, we found that ctDNA molecular residue detection was earlier about 4 months. In summary, our study revealed that serial plasma-derived ctDNA assessments can reflect treatment response, survival, and clonal evolution in adult MDS and AML as a minimally invasive method, which warrant the prospective use of ctDNA as a biomarker in disease monitoring. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81800121) and Zhejiang Medical Association Clinical Research Fund project (grant number: 2017ZYC-A14). The authors also thank all the patients who participated in this study. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant Number: 81800121; Zhejiang Medical Association Clinical Research Fund project, Grant Number: 2017ZYC-A14. The data used in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Abstract:Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is frequently curable after frontline therapy, however, relapses can occur after achievement of a PET-negative complete remission (CR). Early detection of relapse may be associated with improved outcomes, particularly given the development of more active therapies for relapsed, refractory DLBCL. Controversy exists regarding the utility of post-therapy surveillance imaging which is associated with patient (pt) anxiety, radiation exposure, false-positive results, and cost, without clear overall survival benefit in retrospective studies (Thompson JCO 2014). A retrospective study found that serial minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring during DLBCL surveillance could identify pts at risk of relapse before clinical evidence of disease (Roschewski Lancet Oncol 2015). In this multicenter prospective study, we assessed whether a next-generation immunosequencing (IS) MRD assay could be used for early detection of molecular relapse in DLBCL. Methods: Eligible pts with DLBCL or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were enrolled across five cancer centers. In pts who achieved a PET-negative CR, serial peripheral blood samples were obtained every 3 months (mos) and CT scans every 6 mos for 2 years (yrs) post-treatment. The IS MRD assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) that leverages multiplex PCR followed by NGS to identify and track rearrangements of IgH, V-J, D-J and IgK/L loci and translocations in Bcl1/2-IgH was used. MRD positive was defined as any detectable rearrangement and MRD undetectable as no evidence of rearrangement. Results: 500 pts were enrolled and 400 were evaluable (pre-treatment tumor pathology available, completed frontline treatment, and achieved PET-negative CR at end-of-treatment). Baseline characteristics were median age of 62 yrs (range 19-95), male sex 58%, advanced stage 61%, and poor-risk by R-IPI 42%. Histologies included DLBCL, NOS (88%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (6%), HGBCL (5%), T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma (3%), and other (1%). Pts received regimens including RCHOP x 6 cycles (37%), REPOCH x 6 cycles (20%), clinical trial (15%), combined modality therapy (RCHOP+RT) (9%), and other RCHOP variations (19%). Among the 400 evaluable pts, 44 relapses have occurred as of July 1, 2021. In 45% of pts (20/44), clinical relapse was detected using surveillance imaging alone (typically CT CAP with IV contrast) in an otherwise asymptomatic pt with a normal physical exam and laboratory evaluation . In 10% of pts (4/44), relapse was detected by patient-reported clinical symptoms alone. In 45% of pts (20/44), relapse was detected by imaging, clinical symptoms, and/or evaluation by an oncologist. With a median follow-up of 34 months, the 2-year PFS was 88.9% (85.8, 92.1). Advanced age, advanced stage, and poor-risk R-IPI were associated with inferior PFS. Of the 44 relapses, tumor-specific clonotypes were identified in 39 pts (4 failed quality control (QC), 1 failed calibration) and 38 pts had ≥1 sample available within 90 days of relapse. Of 356 patients in ongoing CR, tumor-specific clonotypes were identified in 279 patients (29 failed QC, 33 failed calibration, and 15 are pending sequencing). The patient-level prospective MRD results are shown in Figure 1. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the IS MRD assay was 63% (24/38), 78% (218/279), 28% (24/85), and 94% (218/232), respectively. Plasma MRD detection had improved sensitivity and specificity compared with circulating cells. Among the 24 relapsed patients with a positive MRD result at or before relapse, the median anticipation of the test was 3 months (range 0 to 24 months). Conclusion: Overall outcomes are excellent for DLBCL and HGBCL pts who achieve PET-negative CR. In this multicenter prospective analysis with standardized follow up, a substantial proportion (45%) of clinical relapses are detected radiographically in asymptomatic pts, supporting the value of CT surveillance imaging in DLBCL, particularly for pts with advanced stage or high-risk disease. MRD assessment using the IS MRD assay had suboptimal sensitivity and specificity in the post-treatment surveillance setting in DLBCL. Further study of the clinical context and its correlation with test performance is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Kite Pharmaceuticals: Other: advisory board , Research Funding; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies, Celgene, Abbvie Pharmaceticals, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Westin: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iksuda Therapeutics: Consultancy; Umoja: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding. Schuster: TG Theraputics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tessa Theraputics: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Juno Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Alimera Sciences: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Nowakowski: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lossos: Lymphoma Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; NCI: Research Funding; University of Miami: Current Employment; NIH grants: Research Funding; Stanford University: Patents & Royalties; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jacob: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Current Employment. Mullins: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Current Employment. Zelenetz: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; SecuraBio: Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene/JUNO: Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Honoraria; LFR: Other; MEI Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; MethylGene: Research Funding; NCCN: Other; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria.

Molecular Monitoring with Tumor DNA and Nivolumab Maintenance: A Pilot Study in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Serial Monitoring of Circulating Tumour DNA on Clinical Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Molecular Disease Monitoring in Patients With Relapsed/refractory B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy

Concurrent Monitoring of Peripheral Blood Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Patients Post Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, a Single Center Experience

A Prospective Multicenter Study of Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Using a Next-Generation Immunosequencing Assay and CT Monitoring for Surveillance after Frontline Treatment in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Abstract CT023: Phylogenetic tracking and minimal residual disease detection using ctDNA in early-stage NSCLC: A lung TRACERx study

Tumor-informed ctDNA assessment as a valuable prognostic and predictive biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) across gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

Abstract PO3-13-09: Personalized ctDNA testing for detection of molecular residual disease in patients with localized HR+ breast cancer: temporal dynamics and impact on clinical outcomes

PS1027 ASSESSMENT OF MOLECULAR MRD KINETICS BY ERROR‐CORRECTED NEXT‐GENERATION SEQUENCING PROVIDES INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC INFORMATION IN ADULT AML PATIENTS

Noninvasive Monitoring of Mantle Cell Lymphoma by Immunoglobulin Gene Next-Generation Sequencing in a Phase 2 Study of Sequential Chemoradioimmunotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue

Development of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) for Molecular Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Evaluating novel therapies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of response in curatively treated gastrointestinal cancers with microscopic residual disease.

Moffitt Cancer Center 2-Year Single-Institution Experience with Next-Generation Sequencing Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Clinical Utility, Application, and Correlation with Outcomes in Plasma Cell and Lymphoid Malignancies

Circulating tumor DNA predicts therapeutic outcome in mantle cell lymphoma

Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Radically Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges and Future Directions

Risk profiling of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by measuring circulating tumor DNA

Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor DNA Status Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Enhanced detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) by tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Testing By Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) after Two Cycles (CY) of Non-Intensive Chemoimmunotherapy Is Predictive of Remission Duration and Need for Maintenance Therapy (MT) in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): A Wisconsin Oncology Network Study

Abstract 2793: Minimal residual disease (MRD) as a predictive biomarker/endpoint for novel drug development