Microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) across gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

Harrison David Winters,Paul Sackstein,Benjamin Adam Weinberg,Dipanjan Debnath,Xue Geng,Hongkun Wang,Saavan Chintalacheruvu,John Marshall,Aiwu Ruth He,Marcus Smith Noel,Reetu Mukherji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.176

IF: 45.3

2024-01-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:176 Background: ctDNA is a powerful tool that can detect early evidence of tumor relapse, or MRD. There are limited studies characterizing the performance of ctDNA in non-colorectal GI cancer patients (pts). We describe the clinical outcomes of GI cancer pts who underwent real-world MRD testing at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed GI cancer pts with ≥1 ctDNA test (Natera, Inc) ordered for MRD testing between June 2020-August 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize rates of ctDNA positivity (ctDNA+) and relapse rates (RR). Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (mOS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, group comparisons by log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR) by Cox proportional hazard models. Associations between initial mean tumor molecules per milliliter (MTM/mL) (continuous variable) and clinical factors were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests. Results: ctDNA testing was successful in 222/228 pts (table). The median follow-up was 15 months (mo) (Interquartile Range 8.6-24.7). 61/222 (27.5%) of pts had ≥1 ctDNA+ test of which 59% had relapse on their next scan obtained after a median of 40 days from the first + test. Of all relapsed pts (62/222), ctDNA detected relapse before imaging in 69.4% with a median lead time of 57 days. The positive and negative predictive values of ctDNA for relapse were 82% and 92.5%, respectively. The mRFS was 10.8 mo vs. not reached (NR) (HR 18.6; p 1 test, 49.2% (29/59) cleared ctDNA with 79.3% of clearances on/after therapy. Between ctDNA clearers and non-clearers, RR were 72.4% vs. 93.3%, mRFS 12.4 vs. 7.6 mo (HR 0.3; p=0.6), and mOS NR vs. 43.1 mo (log-rank test p=0.01). No significant associations existed between initial MTM/mL and tumor types (p=0.6), relapse status (p=0.2), or number of relapse sites (p=0.4). Conclusions: ctDNA is a prognostic tool able to detect early relapse with high accuracy in GI cancers. The initial MTM/mL in ctDNA+ pts did not correlate with tumor histology or relapse patterns. Pts clearing ctDNA tended to have improved outcomes; however, RRs were higher than anticipated. More pts and longer follow up will help characterize the performance of ctDNA across rarer GI subtypes. [Table: see text]

oncology