Does persistent crossover (ipsilateral) motor evoked potential (MEP) responses represent a technical failure for intracranial motor tract monitoring? A case example and practical solution

Marshall F. Wilkinson,Kristine Pederson,Philip Kawalec,Joseph Silvaggio,M. Suheel Abdul-Salaam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06390-7
2024-12-08
Acta Neurochirurgica
Abstract:Attention to motor evoked potential (MEP) stimulation intensity is necessary to avoid false negative MEP results during intracranial procedures. Observing ipsilateral (crossover) MEP responses has been hypothesized to indicate inappropriately strong stimulation intensity. We describe a case where persistent crossover MEP responses falsely suggested that stimulus intensity was too high and describe an alternative method to guide the selection of MEP stimulation intensity.
surgery,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?