Abstract:Introduction: A practical solution to the incidental unreliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) may be the simultaneous neurophysiological recording and control of the surgical field through a camera (the concept of "Real-time" IONM). During "Real-time" IONM, the surgeon is immediately warned about the possibility of damage to the neural structures during, but not after, standard idiopathic scoliosis (IS) corrective surgery procedures (the concept of "Surgeon–neurophysiologist" interactive, verbal IONM). This study aimed to compare the advantages, utilities, reliabilities, and time consumption of the two IONM scenarios. Methods: Studies were performed in two similar groups of patients undergoing surgery primarily due to Lenke 2 idiopathic scoliosis (N = 120), when both IONM approaches were applied. Neurophysiological evaluations of the spinal transmission were performed pre- (T0), intra- (before (T1) and after (T2) surgery), and postoperatively (T3), as well as once in healthy volunteers (control, N = 60). Non-invasive and innovative recordings of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally from the peroneal (PER) nerve and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle were performed with surface electrodes as a result of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electrical stimulation (TES) at T0–T3. Results: In both groups, the MEP amplitudes and latencies recorded from the PER nerve were approximately 67% lower and 3.1 ms shorter than those recorded from the TA muscle. The MEP recording parameters differed similarly at T0–T3 compared to the control group. In all patients, the MEP parameters induced by TMS (T0) and TES (T1) did not differ. The MEP amplitude parameters recorded from the TA and PER at T1 and T2 indicated a bilateral improvement in the neural spinal conduction due to the surgical intervention. The TMS-induced MEP amplitude at T3 further increased bilaterally. In both IONM groups, an average 51.8 BIS level of anesthesia did not affect the variability in the MEP amplitude, especially in the PER recordings when the applied TES strength was 98.2 mA. The number of fluctuations in the MEP parameters was closely related to the number of warnings from the neurophysiologist during the transpedicular screw implantation, corrective rod implantation, and distraction, derotation, and compression procedures, and it was higher in the "Surgeon–neurophysiologist" IONM group. The average duration of surgery was shorter by approximately one hour in the "Real-time" IONM group. The number of two-way communications between the surgeon and the neurophysiologist and vice versa in the "Real-time" IONM group decreased by approximately half. Conclusions: This study proves the superiority of using "Real-time" IONM over the standard "Surgeon–neurophysiologist" IONM procedure in increasing the safety and non-invasiveness, shortening the time, and lowering the costs of the surgical treatment of IS patients. The modifications of the MEP nerve-conduction-recording technology with surface electrodes from nerves enable precise and reliable information on the pediatric patient's neurological condition at every stage of the applied surgical procedures, even under conditions of slight fluctuations in anesthesia.

Stereoscopic Monitoring technique for motor area tumors.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the cortico-spinal tract in image-guided mini-invasive neurosurgery

Transcranial versus direct electrical stimulation for intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring: Prognostic value comparison in asleep brain tumor surgery

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A 10-Year Single Center Experience

Safety of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (TES and EMG) for spinal and cranial lesions

Awake Surgery for Tumors of the Parietal Lobe: A Preliminary Experience with a New Protocol of Intraoperative Neuropsychological Test for the Monitoring of the Sensory Area Function

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neurosurgery

"Real-Time Neuromonitoring" Increases the Safety and Non-Invasiveness and Shortens the Duration of Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

Is There a Role for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Intradural Extramedullary Spine Tumors? Results and Indications from an Institutional Series

Intraoperative neurophysiological assessment of disabling symptoms in DBS surgery

Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring – A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring

Application of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Children's Epilepsy Surgery

Prospective Comparison of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for Cortical Mapping of Primary Motor Areas

Factors predicting the feasibility of monitoring lower-limb muscle motor evoked potentials in patients undergoing excision of spinal cord tumors

Long-term motor deficit in brain tumour surgery with preserved intra-operative motor-evoked potentials

Reliability and Predictors of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Changes During Intramedullary Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Experience

Machine learning allows expert level classification of intraoperative motor evoked potentials during neurosurgical procedures

[Application of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Cord Surgery].

Application of intraoperative neuroelectrophysiologic monitoring to gliomas resection in eloquent function brain regions

Detecting and Addressing Secondary Neural Injuries in Cranial Surgery: Case Report

Intra-operative Motor Function Preservation for Resection of Primary Motor Cortex Meningioma