Nonbinding recommendations: the relative effects of focal points versus uncertainty reduction on bargaining outcomes

D. Dickinson,Lynn Hunnicutt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11238-009-9156-0

2010-10-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Effects of Power,Social Motive,and Accountability on the Negotiation Cognition,Behavior,and Outcomes

WEI Qing-wang,ZHENG Quan-quan,YU Guo-liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2010.01.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:A simulated negotiation experiment was designed to explore the different effects of social motive between high power and low power negotiators under either holding accountability or not holding accountability condition by using the negotiation task of job interview.One hundred and fifty-six undergraduate students(78 dyads) took part in a simulated one-to-one negotiation.The players in the same negotiation didn' t know each other and had the same sex.The results indicated:(1) Dyads including one prosocial recruiter held less fixed-pie perceptions than dyads including one proself recruiter for dyad-level outcomes.(2) Dyads consisting of two pro-social or two pro-self negotiators achieved higher joint outcomes and engaged in more problem solving while holding accountability rather than not.Dyads consisting of one pro-social and one pro-self negotiators achieved lower joint outcomes and engaged in more problem solving while holding accountability rather than not.
Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two‐Sided Incomplete Information

Kyle Haynes,Brandon K. Yoder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12464

IF: 4.503

2019-09-09

American Journal of Political Science

Abstract:Conventional models of bargaining and reassurance under incomplete information assume that actors' behavioral signals are objectively cooperative or noncooperative. Even if actors are uncertain of each other's preferences, they know what types of actions the other will view as cooperative. Yet on many real‐world issues, cooperation is subjective, and what constitutes a cooperative action is conditional on the receiver's preferences. We present a formal model showing that in these cases, two‐sided incomplete information actually incentivizes honest behavior and facilitates credible signaling. Because uncertain senders do not know whether a particular action will be interpreted as cooperative, they have little incentive to misrepresent, and instead honestly pursue their true goals. Thus, where cooperation is subjective, mutual uncertainty is "offsetting," such that credible signals allow actors to quickly and accurately update their beliefs. We illustrate this logic through a case study of the Sino–Soviet split, and highlight the model's implications for contemporary U.S.–China relations.

political science
The Effect of Negotiators' Reference Points and their Transposition in Thinking on the Process and Outcome of Negotiations

Zhang Zhixue,Wang Min,Han Yulan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2006.01.011

2006-01-01

Abstract:With a distributive negotiation simulation, in this study we have examined the effects of BVATNA, the goals set by negotiators before negotiation, and the first offer made by negotiators and other reference points or factors on negotiation outcome, and have analyzed the data collected from 66 negotiating dyads (consisting of 132 part-time MBA students), who have reached an agreement respectively in the negotiation. Our findings indicate that, although the BATNA keeps the function of stimulation ( it does motivate negotiators to win better results) , it lowers negotiators' expectations of negotiation results; that, the higher the pro-negotiation goals and the higher the first offer, the more yield the negotiators will gain; and that the initial offer plays a role of medium. In addition, we have examined the effect of transposition in thinking upon negotiation, finding that, the higher a negotiator considers the BVATNA and the goals of his negotiation counterpart to be, the less benefit he will get, the first offer playing a function of "mediation", and that, for the party with stronger bargaining power, changing position in thinking to get things in perspective will reduce the anchoring effect of the first offer made by his counterpart. Also discussed in this article is the impact of different roles upon negotiation outcome.
Bargaining Versus Posted-Price Selling

RQ Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)90043-8

IF: 2.445

1995-01-01

European Economic Review

Abstract:Two popular selling methods - bargaining and posted-price selling - are compared here in a dynamic model. When bargaining costs no more than posted-price selling, we find that bargaining is always optimal. When bargaining costs more, however, bargaining is still preferred if and only if the common cost for both selling methods is large enough. We also find that an increase in the discount rate or the seller's bargaining power favors bargaining. Finally, we find that if the distribution becomes more dispersed and the increase in a buyer's valuation is sufficiently large, bargaining is more likely to be adopted.
Risk Aversion in the Nash Bargaining Problem with Uncertainty

Sanxi Li,Hailin Sun,Jianye Yan,Xundong Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-014-0413-5

2014-01-01

Journal of Economics

Abstract:In this study, we apply the aggregation property of Identical Shape Harmonic Absolute Risk Aversion utility functions to analyze the comparative statics properties of a bargaining model with uncertainty. We identify sufficient and necessary conditions under which an increase in one's degree of risk aversion benefits/hurts one's opponent. We apply our model to analyze the problems of bargaining over both insurance and incentive contracts.
Reputational Bargaining with Ultimatum Opportunities

Mehmet Ekmekci,Hanzhe Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.01581

2021-05-04

Theoretical Economics

Abstract:We study two-sided reputational bargaining with opportunities to issue an ultimatum -- threats to force dispute resolution. Each player is either a justified type, who never concedes and issues an ultimatum whenever an opportunity arrives, or an unjustified type, who can concede, wait, or bluff with an ultimatum. In equilibrium, the presence of ultimatum opportunities can harm or benefit a player by decelerating or accelerating reputation building. When only one player can issue an ultimatum, equilibrium play is unique. The hazard rate of dispute resolution is discontinuous and piecewise monotonic in time. As the probabilities of being justified vanish, agreement is immediate and efficient, and if the set of justifiable demands is rich, payoffs modify Abreu and Gul (2000), with the discount rate replaced by the ultimatum opportunity arrival rate if the former is smaller. When both players' ultimatum opportunities arrive sufficiently fast, there may exist multiple equilibria in which their reputations do not build up and negotiation lasts forever.
Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Theodor Cimpeanu,Cedric Perret,Anh Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.03461

2021-02-06

Abstract:Institutions and investors face the constant challenge of making accurate decisions and predictions regarding how best they should distribute their endowments. The problem of achieving an optimal outcome at minimal cost has been extensively studied and resolved using several heuristics. However, these works usually fail to address how an external party can target different types of fair behaviour or do not take into account how limited information can shape this complex interplay. Here, we consider the well-known Ultimatum game in a spatial setting and propose a hierarchy of interference mechanisms based on the amount of information available to an external decision-maker and desired standards of fairness. Our analysis reveals that monitoring the population at a macroscopic level requires more strict information gathering in order to obtain an optimal outcome and that local observations can mediate this requirement. Moreover, we identify the conditions which must be met for an individual to be eligible for investment in order to avoid unnecessary spending. We further explore the effects of varying mutation or behavioural exploration rates on the choice of investment strategy and total accumulated costs to the investor. Overall, our analysis provides new insights about efficient heuristics for cost-efficient promotion of fairness in societies. Finally, we discuss the differences between our findings and previous work done on the PD and present our suggestions for promoting fairness as an external decision-maker.

Multiagent Systems,Computer Science and Game Theory
Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives.

Anyi Ma,Rebecca Ponce de Leon,Ashleigh Shelby Rosette

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001138

IF: 11.8025

2023-10-12

Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract:Both research and conventional wisdom suggest that, due to their relational orientation, women are less likely than men to engage in agentic and assertive behaviors, leading them to underperform in zero-sum, distributive negotiations where one party's gain is equivalent to the other party's loss. However, past research tends to neglect the costs of reaching impasse by excluding impasses from measures of negotiation performance. Departing from this convention, we incorporate the economic costs of impasses into measures of negotiation performance to provide a more holistic examination of negotiation outcomes. In so doing, we reveal a reversal of the oft-cited male performance advantage when obtaining an impasse is especially economically costly (as is the case when negotiators have weak negotiation alternatives). Specifically, we predicted that female negotiators would make less assertive first offers than men due to their more relational orientation and that these gender differences in offer assertiveness should result in women avoiding impasse more often than men. Since avoiding impasses should improve negotiation performance when negotiators are able to obtain a deal that is more valuable than their negotiation alternative, women's tendency to avoid impasses should improve their performance when negotiators have weak (vs. strong) alternatives. These predictions were supported in eight studies (three preregistered) across various negotiation contexts, comprising data from the television show Shark Tank (Study 1), four incentive-compatible negotiation simulations (Studies 2 and 3, Supplemental Studies), and a multistudy causal experimental chain (Supplemental Studies 4a-c). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, applied,management
A Further Exploration of the Uncertainty Effect

Yitong Wang,Tianjun Feng,L. Robin Keller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-013-9180-x

2013-01-01

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Abstract:Individual valuation of a binary lottery at values less than the lottery’s worst outcome has been designated as the “uncertainty effect”. Our paper aims to explore the boundary conditions of the uncertainty effect by investigating a plausible underlying process and proposing two possible methods. First, we examine how providing an exogenous evaluation opportunity prior to judging the value of the lottery affects individuals’ judgments, and find that first valuing the worst outcome and then the lottery eliminates the uncertainty effect. Second, we explore whether introducing additional cognitive load dampens how far decision makers correct their initial evaluations, and find that additional cognitive load is able to eliminate the uncertainty effect.
Analysis for the Bargaining Confidence Degree in Relocation Disputes Based on the Rubinstein Bargaining Model

Zhongfu Qin,Mingtao Zhang,Xiaolong Lei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/etmhs-15.2015.203

2015-01-01

Abstract:The relocation dispute is a common type of dispute issues. The core of the relocation dispute usually lies in the divergence on the amount of the relocation compensation and the process of fighting for it among all the parties. Aiming at the limitations of the Rubinstein bargaining model for the analysis of the bargaining in relocation disputes, this paper, based upon the information asymmetry and dynamics of the relocation issue, redefines the discount factor as the bargaining confidence degree. In the meanwhile, this paper analyzes the interaction and restriction relationship between the bargaining confidence degree and the subjective factors of the bargaining player under the condition of information asymmetry and dynamics.
Fixed-point solutions to the regress problem in normative uncertainty

Philip Trammell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02098-9

IF: 1.595

2019-02-14

Synthese

Abstract:Abstract When we are faced with a choice among acts, but are uncertain about the true state of the world, we may be uncertain about the acts’ “choiceworthiness”. Decision theories guide our choice by making normative claims about how we should respond to this uncertainty. If we are unsure which decision theory is correct, however, we may remain unsure of what we ought to do. Given this decision-theoretic uncertainty, meta-theories attempt to resolve the conflicts between our decision theories...but we may be unsure which meta-theory is correct as well. This reasoning can launch a regress of ever-higher-order uncertainty, which may leave one forever uncertain about what one ought to do. There is, fortunately, a class of circumstances under which this regress is not a problem. If one holds a cardinal understanding of subjective choiceworthiness, and accepts certain other criteria (which are too weak to specify any particular decision theory), one’s hierarchy of metanormative uncertainty ultimately converges to precise definitions of “subjective choiceworthiness” for any finite set of acts. If one allows the metanormative regress to extend to the transfinite ordinals, the convergence criteria can be weakened further. Finally, the structure of these results applies straightforwardly not just to decision-theoretic uncertainty, but also to other varieties of normative uncertainty, such as moral uncertainty.

history & philosophy of science
Bidding under Uncertainty: Theory and Experiments

Amy Greenwald,Justin Boyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1207.4108

2012-07-11

Computer Science and Game Theory

Abstract:This paper describes a study of agent bidding strategies, assuming combinatorial valuations for complementary and substitutable goods, in three auction environments: sequential auctions, simultaneous auctions, and the Trading Agent Competition (TAC) Classic hotel auction design, a hybrid of sequential and simultaneous auctions. The problem of bidding in sequential auctions is formulated as an MDP, and it is argued that expected marginal utility bidding is the optimal bidding policy. The problem of bidding in simultaneous auctions is formulated as a stochastic program, and it is shown by example that marginal utility bidding is not an optimal bidding policy, even in deterministic settings. Two alternative methods of approximating a solution to this stochastic program are presented: the first method, which relies on expected values, is optimal in deterministic environments; the second method, which samples the nondeterministic environment, is asymptotically optimal as the number of samples tends to infinity. Finally, experiments with these various bidding policies are described in the TAC Classic setting.
Whose recommendations do you follow? An investigation of tie strength, shopping stage, and deal scarcity.

Tingting Song,Cheng Yi,Jinghua Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.003

IF: 10.328

2017-01-01

Information & Management

Abstract:•We find a three-way interaction of social recommendation, shopping stage, and scarcity.•Weak-tie recommendations are more persuasive at initial stages when scarcity is low.•Weak-tie recommendations’ superiority weakens at initial stages when scarcity is high.•Strong-tie recommendations are more persuasive at later stages when scarcity is low.•Strong-tie recommendations’ superiority weakens at later stages when scarcity is high.
Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Multi-Stage Optimization Feedback Mechanism with Individual Bounded Confidences

Quanbo Zha,Yucheng Dong,Francisco Chiclana,Enrique Herrera-Viedma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2021.3113571

IF: 12.253

2021-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract:Existing consensus models focus on improving the group consensus level, but ignore whether a higher group consensus level means higher mutual acceptance of decision makers. In the field of opinion dynamics, the bounded confidence model asserts that the decision makers will accept the preferences of others within a neighborhood of theirs with width a certain confidence level. Inspired by this research methodology, this article develops a consensus model to address the acceptance issue based on individual bounded confidences. Specifically, a bounded confidence-based consensus measure is designed to measure the level of group mutual acceptance, and a multi-stage optimization feedback mechanism based on individual bounded confidences is proposed to maximize the group mutual acceptance and minimize the amount of preference adjustment. A numerical example and a simulation analysis are included to illustrate the use of the model and to justify its effectiveness, respectively.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic
Consideration sets and reference points in a dynamic bargaining game

Emin Karagözoğlu,Kerim Keskin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.01.031

IF: 2

2024-02-10

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Abstract:We introduce the notion of limited consideration into a bilateral, infinite-horizon, alternating-offers bargaining game. Both agents have reference-dependent preferences, and their reference points are dynamically updated. An agent's current consideration set (or focus) is influenced by the last offer he rejected such that the most salient point in that consideration set becomes his current reference point. We provide an implicit characterization of stationary subgame perfect Nash equilibria in our model. Without resorting to asymmetric or incomplete information, we show that our bargaining game can produce delay and disagreement in equilibrium. In addition to analytical results on the disagreement conditions and the nature of agreements, we provide computational comparative statics on model parameters and study their impacts on delay.

economics
Concessions in Negotiations: the Roles of Initial Assessment and Signaling on Outcomes of a Negotiated Agreement

Li Ma,Sammy Showail,Rachel Campagna,Judi McLean Parks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908156

2006-01-01

Abstract:This study explores the roles of calibrated (annual vs. hourly wage) positions on negotiators' expected contentiousness and estimation of reservation price on negotiators' initial offers and final outcomes. In a distributive labor negotiation, we found negotiator determinations of reservation prices served as an anchor such that the more ambitious their reservation prices, the less they conceded in opening offers. In addition, we found when wage rates were calibrated to reflect annual, rather than hourly earnings, negotiators anticipated a contentious negotiation. Those anticipating contention made less concessionary initial offers. We also found that the more concessionary their opening offer, the less successful their outcome, but the lower their negotiation costs (strike days). Concessions in the opening offer might serve as a partial mediator of reservation prices. In the ongoing of negotiation process, negotiators conceded more when they expected their counterparts' offers have been close to counterparts' reservation price. Taken together, this study demonstrates the importance of preparation processes, including the impact of initial assessments of the negotiation and the signaling effect of their opening offers. Most current research explores the impact of the on-going process or the personal (conflict style) and contextual factors that impact negotiator outcomes. This study looks at aspects of the preparation, such as developing target and reservation prices and the initial offers, as well as the impact of calibrated (annual vs. hourly wage) positions on negotiation outcomes and processes.
Robust Consensus Modeling: Concerning Consensus Fairness and Efficiency with Uncertain Costs

Xuyuan Zhang,Hailin Liang,Shaojian Qu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12081266

IF: 2.4

2024-04-23

Mathematics

Abstract:Extensive uncertainty can affect the efficiency and fairness of consensus in the consensus reaching process (CRP), but few scholars have studied consensus modeling that focuses on fairness and efficiency in uncertain environments. Additionally, the weight of the decision maker (DM) in the CRP is influenced by multiple factors. Therefore, this paper proposes robust consensus models (EFCMs) focusing on fairness and efficiency under uncertain costs to address these issues. Firstly, this paper constructs multiple uncertainty sets to describe the uncertainty of the unit adjustment cost. Secondly, the fair utility level and opinion adjustment distance are used to measure the fairness and efficiency of reaching consensus, respectively. Furthermore, this paper uses a data-driven method based on the KDE method combined with trust propagation in social networks to determine the DMs' weights jointly. Finally, this paper also applies the proposed models to the carbon emission reduction negotiation process between the government and enterprises. The experimental results and sensitivity analysis show that the consensus cost budget and the DMs' jealous preference behavior particularly affects the efficiency of reaching consensus, which provides a theoretical basis for solving practical decision making problems.

mathematics
Ideal Default For Resolving Disputes Efficiently

Nejat Anbarci,Gorkem Celik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12737

IF: 1.418

2024-10-12

International Economic Review

Abstract:We study arbitration mechanisms where two parties to the dispute have single‐peaked preferences over outcomes, represented by concave utility functions. The most preferred outcome of each party is her private information. By participating in an arbitration mechanism, the parties forfeit the default outcome, which is set without consideration of private preferences. We show that the ideal default outcome for efficient dispute resolution maximizes the sum of the reservation payoffs of the most difficult agent types to persuade to participate in the mechanism. This result is contrary to the conventional wisdom that an unattractive default could force the parties to agree.

economics
Tullock contest with reference‐dependent preferences

Francesco Fallucchi,Francesco Trevisan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13251

2024-09-09

Economic Inquiry

Abstract:We study the Tullock contest model with loss aversion and endogenously formed reference points. In a contest with n possibly heterogeneous players and convex effort costs, we establish sufficient conditions for a unique Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Subsequently, we analyze the impact of loss aversion on players' spending behavior, probability of winning, and rent dissipation.

economics
An adaptive optimization consensus mechanism for group decision making using the Shapley allocation scheme

Fanyong Meng,Dengyu Zhao,Chunqiao Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119752

IF: 8.1

2024-01-01

Information Sciences

Abstract:Adaptive consensus mechanism adopts differentiating consensus improvement strategies according to different consensus levels, which is reasonable and efficient for reaching consensus in group decision making. However, previous adaptive consensus methods adopt the feedback iteration mechanism, which has drawbacks such as time-consuming, over-consensus adjustment, and failure of consensus-reaching. Therefore, this paper studies the adaptive consensus mechanism by optimization models to avoid the above issues of the feedback iteration mechanism. In our approach, corresponding optimization models are constructed to identify non-consensus judgments, non-consensus alternatives, and non-consensus decision makers, respectively. Meanwhile, the related total minimum consensus adjustments are ascertained. Since the uniqueness of the consensus adjustment scheme cannot be ensured according to the built models, we regard it as a cost allocation problem in cooperative games, and define three types of consensus adjustment cooperative games. After that, the Shapley function, a well-known single payoff index, is adopted to allocate total consensus adjustments in different cases. Additionally, we employ the optimization model to determine the modified values of non-consensus judgments by minimizing the number of adjustment judgments. Finally, numerical study and comparison are made.

computer science, information systems

Nonbinding recommendations: the relative effects of focal points versus uncertainty reduction on bargaining outcomes

The Effects of Power,Social Motive,and Accountability on the Negotiation Cognition,Behavior,and Outcomes

Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two‐Sided Incomplete Information

The Effect of Negotiators' Reference Points and their Transposition in Thinking on the Process and Outcome of Negotiations

Bargaining Versus Posted-Price Selling

Risk Aversion in the Nash Bargaining Problem with Uncertainty

Reputational Bargaining with Ultimatum Opportunities

Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives.

A Further Exploration of the Uncertainty Effect

Analysis for the Bargaining Confidence Degree in Relocation Disputes Based on the Rubinstein Bargaining Model

Fixed-point solutions to the regress problem in normative uncertainty

Bidding under Uncertainty: Theory and Experiments

Whose recommendations do you follow? An investigation of tie strength, shopping stage, and deal scarcity.

Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Multi-Stage Optimization Feedback Mechanism with Individual Bounded Confidences

Consideration sets and reference points in a dynamic bargaining game

Concessions in Negotiations: the Roles of Initial Assessment and Signaling on Outcomes of a Negotiated Agreement

Robust Consensus Modeling: Concerning Consensus Fairness and Efficiency with Uncertain Costs

Ideal Default For Resolving Disputes Efficiently

Tullock contest with reference‐dependent preferences

An adaptive optimization consensus mechanism for group decision making using the Shapley allocation scheme