Re: Chromosomal aberration, micronucleus and Comet assays on peripheral blood lymphocytes of leprosy patients undergoing multidrug treatment (Mutagenesis, 17, 309-312, 2002).

A. Nersesyan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/MUTAGE/18.3.307
2003-05-01
Mutagenesis
Abstract:I studied with great interest the research findings of Kalaiselvi et al. (2002) who evaluated the genetic damage in leprosy patients undergoing multidrug therapy (MDT) by means of the chromosomal aberrations (CA), micronuclei and Comet assays. All assays applied showed genetic damage in treated leprosy patients. It is known that leprosy patients are different in terms of bacteriological index, immunological status, histology and clinical features (Ridley and Jopling, 1966). For genetic studies in leprosy patients, D’Souza and Das (1994) classified them into two groups, paubacillary (tuberculoid forms of leprosy) and multibacillary (lepromatous forms of leprosy). CA and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) levels, both background and induced by some mutagens, are significantly higher in multibacillary patients compared to paubacillary ones (D’Souza and Das, 1994). There is no information about the status of the patients (paubacillary or multibacillary) in the paper of Kalaiselvi et al. (2002). As they studied possible mutagenic (genotoxic) effects of MDT, it is extremely important to mention in the text of the article the following: (i) whether the patients were primary or not; (ii) what drugs, schedules and doses were used; (iii) the duration and number of courses. These questions are extremely important for evaluation of genotoxic effects of any drug. And if any of the mentioned conditions is different for some patients, it is a serious mistake to pool the results and compare with controls. Kalaiselvi et al. (2002) cited the paper of Masjedi et al. (2000) concerning almost the same problem, the study of genetic damage induced by MDT in tuberculosis patients. In that article, no such questions arise because of adequate presentation of materials and methods. Kalaiselvi et al. (2002) also cited the paper of Peters et al. (1983), but they omitted the most important data presented in this paper, that patients receiving antileprosy therapy with clofazimine, dapsone and/or rifampicin do not show mutagenic/ clastogenic effects. Kalaiselvi et al. (2002) wrote that ‘D’Souza et al. (1991) indicated higher incidence of CA and SCE in leprosy patients treated with MDT’. However, D’Souza et al. (1991) and D’Souza and Das (1994) actually showed that dapsone in combination with rifamoicin and dapsone with rifampicin and clofazimine did not induce CA in lymphocytes of treated leprosy patients. Moreover, in treated multibacilary patients the CA level was significantly reduced compared with the level before therapy (Peters et al., 1983; D’Souza et al.,
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the crystal structure of a newly discovered superconducting phase in NbN (niobium nitride) material. Specifically, the researchers used the first - principles - based pseudopotential plane - wave method to calculate the energies of different crystal phases in order to determine whether the recently reported cubic - phase NbN with a superconducting transition temperature of 16.4 K does indeed have the NbO structure type. ### Main problems and background 1. **Newly discovered superconducting phase**: - A new NbN superconducting phase was recently synthesized by pulsed - laser deposition technology, and its superconducting transition temperature \(T_c\) is 16.4 K. - Experimental results show that this new phase has a primitive cubic lattice and is proposed to be of the NbO structure type, with a lattice constant of 4.442 Å. 2. **Differences between theory and experiment**: - Theoretical calculations indicate that if NbN forms the NbO structure, its energy is relatively high, and the theoretically predicted lattice constant (4.207 Å) is significantly smaller than the experimental value (4.442 Å). - This difference suggests that the new superconducting phase of NbN may not be of the NbO structure type. ### Solutions and methods 1. **Total energy calculation**: - The first - principles pseudopotential method based on the plane - wave basis set was used for total energy calculation. - The total energies of known NbN structures (such as CW, NiAs, B1, etc.) were calculated to verify the accuracy of the calculation method. - A detailed energy calculation was carried out for the NbO structure, and the results show that its energy is relatively high and the lattice constant does not conform to the experimental data. 2. **Search for alternative structures**: - All possible primitive cubic lattice space groups were examined, considering structures with three to five formula units. - Two new structures (P23 and P4332) were found, but these structures are also not energetically favorable. - Other possible structures, such as the P4/mmm structure (a tetragonal - symmetry vacancy - ordered B1 derivative), were explored, but their energies are still not as good as that of the B1 structure. 3. **Further exploration**: - Two complementary methods were proposed to find the correct crystal structure: - Focus on structures with lower energy, such as the B3 structure (face - centered cubic structure). - Consider crystallographically allowed structures that are compatible with existing experimental observations, such as structures that allow partial occupation of Wyckoff positions. ### Conclusions - The research shows that the new superconducting phase of NbN is unlikely to be of the NbO structure type because this structure is energetically unfavorable and its lattice constant does not match the experimental data. - Some possible alternative structures were proposed. Although they also have some problems, they still provide directions for further experiments. - Further experimental data are required to narrow down the theoretical possibilities and finally determine the structure of the new superconducting phase. Through these efforts, the researchers hope to reveal the real structure of the new superconducting phase of NbN and provide valuable clues for future research.