Big Bad Nucleosynthesis: A Review

Lawrence M. Krauss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632%2895%2900477-Q

1995-01-28

Abstract:Big Bang Nucleosynthesis represents perhaps the first, and still perhaps the most powerful particle-astrophysics connection. As such, it should provide an example for other work in this area. I discuss the current status of standard model BBN predictions and constraints, and then argue that the issue of observational systematic uncertainties is the key feature limiting our ability to constrain theory with observation. Nevertheless, several very important constraints are currently obtainable. For example, assuming maximal systematic uncertainties in $^4$He, D, and $^7$Li we find a conservative upper limit of $\Omega_B \le 0.16$ in order for BBN predictions to agree with observations. Equally significant, we find that BBN predictions are inconsistent unless $^4He$ abundance by mass is greater than $23.9\%$, or D +$^3$He estimates are incorrect. By contrast, unless systematic uncertainties are taken into account, the quoted $2\sigma$ observational upper limit on the primordial $^4He$ fraction is $23.8\%$.

Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the problem of systematic uncertainties between the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory and observations. Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Consistency between theoretical predictions and observational data**: The paper explores the relationship between BBN predictions under the standard model and the estimated abundances of light elements in observations, especially how to use these predictions to constrain parameters in particle physics and cosmology.

2. **Impact of systematic uncertainties**: The author emphasizes that one of the biggest challenges in current BBN research is the impact of systematic uncertainties on the consistency between theory and observations. These uncertainties mainly come from the processing methods of observational data, model assumptions, and the precision of experimental measurements.

3. **Specific constraint conditions**:
- **Abundance of helium - 4 (\(^4\text{He}\))**: The paper discusses that, considering the maximum systematic uncertainty, the mass abundance of helium - 4 needs to be greater than 23.9% in order to make the BBN predictions consistent with the observational results.
- **Abundances of deuterium (D) and lithium - 7 (\(^7\text{Li}\))**: The author points out that there are also significant systematic uncertainties in the abundance estimates of these elements, and these uncertainties will affect the constraints on cosmological parameters.

4. **Monte Carlo analysis**: In order to evaluate these uncertainties more accurately, the author uses the Monte Carlo method to simulate the BBN process and determines the 95% confidence intervals of different light element abundances.

5. **Statistical correlations**: The paper also explores the statistical correlations between different light element abundances, pointing out that these correlations are very important in evaluating BBN constraints because they will affect the allowed parameter ranges.

6. **Future research directions**: The author believes that as cosmology gradually becomes an empirical science, understanding systematic uncertainties will be the key to using data to constrain theories. Therefore, future research should pay more attention to the evaluation and handling of systematic uncertainties.

In general, this paper aims to provide more accurate constraints on cosmological parameters by detailed analysis of the relationship between BBN theory and observational data, especially the impact of systematic uncertainties.