Abstract:In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a number of Shakespeare scholars, including Israel Gollancz (1894), H.R.D. Anders (1904), J. Churton Collins (1904), and Gilbert Murray (1914) wrote convincingly of Shakespeare’s debt to classical Greek drama. However, in the century since, most scholars and editors have repeatedly held that Shakespeare was not familiar with Greek drama. In Classical Mythology in Shakespeare (1903), Robert Kilburn Root expressed the opinion on Shakespeare’s ‘lesse Greek’ that presaged this enduring dismissal: “It is at any rate certain that he nowhere alludes to any characters or episodes of Greek drama, that they extended no influence whatsoever on his conception of mythology.” (p. 6) This century-long consensus against Attic dramatic influence was reinforced by A.D. Nutall, who wrote, “that Shakespeare was cut off from Greek poetry and drama is probably a bleak truth that we should accept.” (Nutall, 2004, p.210) Scholars have preferred to maintain that Plutarch or Ovid were Shakespeare’s surrogate literary mediators for the playwright’s adaptations from Greek myth and theatre. Other scholars, however, have questioned these assumptions, including Laurie Maguire, who observed that “invoking Shakespeare’s imagined conversations in the Mermaid tavern is not a methodology likely to convince skeptics that Shakespeare knew Greek drama.” (p. 98) This near-universal rejection of Greek drama as Shakespeare sources have profound philological implications. Indeed, this essay argues that the proscription against recognizing the Attic canon as an influence in Shakespeare has been driven by the belief that Will Shakspere of Stratford had, at most, an education that was Latin-based. The examples show that the real author had to have been exposed to both the Greek language and the Greek dramatists. Evidence for alternative candidates, including Edward de Vere, shows that many were schooled in Greek and that some even collected and supported translations of Greek works. It is my contention that Shakespeare’s dramatic imagination was actually fired by the Greeks, and Shakespeare research has clearly suffered from a century of denial.

Searching for Shakespeare in the Stars

Language Individuation and Marker Words: Shakespeare and His Maxwell's Demon

A Century of Scholarly Neglect: Shakespeare and Greek Drama

Shakespeare and cognition: Scientism, theory, and 4E

Did William Shakespeare and Thomas Kyd Write Edward III?

Tudor Humanism and the Roman Past: A Background to Shakespeare

The Space of Shakespeare Chinese Full Text

to Hamlet

Shakespeare in Berlioz, Berlioz in Shakespeare

The Poet and The King—Shakespeare's Political Wisdom from His Julius Caesar

A New Approach To Shakespeare: A Review Of Shakespeare In The Post-War English Drama

The neurology in Shakespeare

Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare

Huon of Bordeaux: First Modern English Translation by Catherine M. Jones and William W. Kibler. Medieval & Renaissance Text Series. New York and Bristol: Italica Press, 2021, xxiii, 329 pp.

The African Imprint in Shakespeare

Shakespeare's Sea and the Frontier of Knowledge

Why Molière most likely did write his plays

An Interdisciplinary interpretation of literature through the lens of Quantum Theory

Shakespeare as a Historicist: The Illuminations of His History Plays to Us

The most fundamental question of all times

Three Translators in Search of an Author: Linguistic Strategies and Language Models in the (Re)translation of Shakespeare’s Plays into Catalan