to Hamlet

Iván Nyusztay
Abstract:In the large body of scholarship devoted to the study of Shakespeare’s classical sources, a relatively small but distinguished segment deals with the direct or indirect influence of Attic tragedy on Shakespeare’s dramatic art. In spite of or even in accordance with the firmly established and widely accepted tenet of Senecan influence, scholars never cease to surprise us with new theories and findings about possible parallels between the tragedies of Shakespeare and those of Aeschylus, Sophocles or Euripides. The scope of such research may range from a philologically oriented critical revaluation of Shakespeare’s reading to theoretical surveys of structural similarities, often within one and the same study as even a brief look into Emrys Jones’s magisterial The Origins of Shakespeare will demonstrate. Given the curious neglect of Attic drama in Elizabethan (and, in general, early modern English) literature (e.g. no English translation of Aeschylus was published before 1777), the prevalence of this critical trend might at first seem strange. Yet there are several reasons why the questions and doubts raised by such studies should
History
What problem does this paper attempt to address?