Abstract:Modification of ecosystems as a consequence of urbanisation alters natural habitat structures and soundscapes, creating constraints for vocal communication in animals. Birds are able to adjust their vocalisation to the prevailing acoustic features of their habitat. As such, their sounds have been shown to reflect the level of anthropogenic disturbances across landscapes. While the effect of a single anthropogenic disturbance like ambient noise on birds' vocal communication is widely investigated, the combined effects of various disturbances remain less explored. We tested single and combined effects of anthropogenic noise and urban physical structures on the vocalisations of two African passerines, the Common Bulbul Pycnonotus barbatus and Northern Grey-headed Sparrow Passer griseus . We predicted that (i) both species would increase the minimum frequency of their vocalisation to avoid masking by ambient noise, (ii) both species would decrease their maximum frequency to evade distortion by physical structures, (iii) the two urban components would have a significant combined effect on the vocalisations, and (iv) the change in minimum or maximum frequency will lead to a corresponding change in the vocalisation bandwidth. For the Common Bulbul, the minimum frequency increased significantly as the ambient noise level increased, but the maximum frequency did not change in response to urban physical structures. For the Northern Grey-headed Sparrow, the minimum frequency did not show a response to ambient noise, but the maximum frequency decreased significantly as physical structures and ambient noise increased. We did not find any evidence for a combined effect of urban physical structures and ambient noise on the vocal adjustment of either species. A change in either the minimum or maximum frequency resulted in a corresponding change in the vocalisation bandwidth of each species. Our findings highlight how the same vocalisation traits of different songbird species can be affected differently by novel selective pressures in acoustic communication that arise in urban environments. La modification des écosystèmes due à l'urbanisation altère les structures de l'habitat naturel et l'environnement sonore, créant des contraintes pour la communication vocale chez les animaux. Les oiseaux sont capables d'ajuster leur vocalisation aux caractéristiques acoustiques dominantes de leur habitat. Il a donc été démontré que leurs sons reflètent le niveau de perturbations anthropiques dans les paysages. Alors que l'effet d'une seule perturbation anthropique comme le bruit ambiant sur la communication vocale des oiseaux est largement étudié, les effets combinés de diverses perturbations restent moins explorés. Nous avons testé les effets uniques et combinés du bruit anthropogénique et des structures physiques urbaines sur la vocalisation de deux passereaux africains, le Bulbul commun Pycnonotus barbatus et le Moineau à tête grise Passer griseus . Nous avons prédit que les deux espèces: (i) augmenteraient la fréquence minimale de leurs vocalisations pour éviter le masquage par le bruit ambiant, (ii) diminueraient leur fréquence maximale pour éviter la distorsion par les structures physiques, (iii) les deux composantes urbaines auraient un effet combiné significatif sur les vocalisations, et (iv) le changement de la fréquence minimale ou maximale conduirait à un changement correspondant de la largeur de bande des vocalisations. Pour le Bulbul commun, la fréquence minimale a augmenté de manière significative lorsque le niveau de bruit ambiant a augmenté, mais la fréquence maximale n'a pas réagi aux structures physiques. Pour le Moineau à tête grise, la fréquence minimale n'a pas répondu au bruit ambiant, mais la fréquence maximale a diminué de manière significative lorsque les structures physiques et le bruit ambiant ont augmenté. Nous n'avons trouvé aucune preuve d'un effet combiné des structures physiques et du bruit ambiant sur l'ajustement vocal des deux espèces. Le changement de la fréquence minimale ou maximale a entraîné un rétrécissement correspondant de la largeur de bande des vocalisations des deux espèces. Nos résultats mettent en évidence comment les mêmes traits de vocalisation de différentes espèces d'oiseaux chanteurs peuvent être affectés différemment par de nouvelles pressions sélectives dans la communication acoustique qui surviennent dans les environnements urbains.

Propagation of bird acoustic signals: comparative study of starling and blackbird distress calls

Long distance calls: negligible information loss of seabird social vocalisations over propagation down to the hearing threshold

Long distance calls: Negligible information loss of little auk social vocalisations due to high frequency propagation losses

Functional neurogenomic responses to acoustic threats, including a heterospecific referential alarm call and its referent, in the auditory forebrain of red-winged blackbirds

Experimentally broadcast ocean surf and river noise alters birdsong

Global analysis of acoustic frequency characteristics in birds

Song-based species discrimination and behaviour assessment by female blackbirds, Turdus merula

Difference in acoustic responses to urbanisation in two African passerines

Foreign–local microdialect discrimination in a songbird, the black redstart

Urbanization alters the song propagation of two human-commensal songbird species

Meta-analysis of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis reveals no support for the effect of vegetation structure on acoustic signalling across terrestrial vertebrates

Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis)

Discriminating between similar alarm calls of contrasting function

Differential impact of anthropogenic noise during the acoustic development of begging calls in Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus)

Variation in chick-a-dee call sequences, not in the fine structure of chick-a-dee calls, influences mobbing behaviour in mixed-species flocks

Call for Your Life: Acoustic Structure and Age‐Sex Differences in Distress Calls of Red‐Necked Nightjars

Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls

Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?

Bioacoustic Monitoring Reveals Details of Tricolored Blackbird Breeding Phenology

Anthropogenic noise affects winter song structure of a long-distance migrant, Gambel’s white-crowned sparrow

Noise constrains heterospecific eavesdropping more than conspecific reception of alarm calls