Abstract:Modification of ecosystems as a consequence of urbanisation alters natural habitat structures and soundscapes, creating constraints for vocal communication in animals. Birds are able to adjust their vocalisation to the prevailing acoustic features of their habitat. As such, their sounds have been shown to reflect the level of anthropogenic disturbances across landscapes. While the effect of a single anthropogenic disturbance like ambient noise on birds' vocal communication is widely investigated, the combined effects of various disturbances remain less explored. We tested single and combined effects of anthropogenic noise and urban physical structures on the vocalisations of two African passerines, the Common Bulbul Pycnonotus barbatus and Northern Grey-headed Sparrow Passer griseus . We predicted that (i) both species would increase the minimum frequency of their vocalisation to avoid masking by ambient noise, (ii) both species would decrease their maximum frequency to evade distortion by physical structures, (iii) the two urban components would have a significant combined effect on the vocalisations, and (iv) the change in minimum or maximum frequency will lead to a corresponding change in the vocalisation bandwidth. For the Common Bulbul, the minimum frequency increased significantly as the ambient noise level increased, but the maximum frequency did not change in response to urban physical structures. For the Northern Grey-headed Sparrow, the minimum frequency did not show a response to ambient noise, but the maximum frequency decreased significantly as physical structures and ambient noise increased. We did not find any evidence for a combined effect of urban physical structures and ambient noise on the vocal adjustment of either species. A change in either the minimum or maximum frequency resulted in a corresponding change in the vocalisation bandwidth of each species. Our findings highlight how the same vocalisation traits of different songbird species can be affected differently by novel selective pressures in acoustic communication that arise in urban environments. La modification des écosystèmes due à l'urbanisation altère les structures de l'habitat naturel et l'environnement sonore, créant des contraintes pour la communication vocale chez les animaux. Les oiseaux sont capables d'ajuster leur vocalisation aux caractéristiques acoustiques dominantes de leur habitat. Il a donc été démontré que leurs sons reflètent le niveau de perturbations anthropiques dans les paysages. Alors que l'effet d'une seule perturbation anthropique comme le bruit ambiant sur la communication vocale des oiseaux est largement étudié, les effets combinés de diverses perturbations restent moins explorés. Nous avons testé les effets uniques et combinés du bruit anthropogénique et des structures physiques urbaines sur la vocalisation de deux passereaux africains, le Bulbul commun Pycnonotus barbatus et le Moineau à tête grise Passer griseus . Nous avons prédit que les deux espèces: (i) augmenteraient la fréquence minimale de leurs vocalisations pour éviter le masquage par le bruit ambiant, (ii) diminueraient leur fréquence maximale pour éviter la distorsion par les structures physiques, (iii) les deux composantes urbaines auraient un effet combiné significatif sur les vocalisations, et (iv) le changement de la fréquence minimale ou maximale conduirait à un changement correspondant de la largeur de bande des vocalisations. Pour le Bulbul commun, la fréquence minimale a augmenté de manière significative lorsque le niveau de bruit ambiant a augmenté, mais la fréquence maximale n'a pas réagi aux structures physiques. Pour le Moineau à tête grise, la fréquence minimale n'a pas répondu au bruit ambiant, mais la fréquence maximale a diminué de manière significative lorsque les structures physiques et le bruit ambiant ont augmenté. Nous n'avons trouvé aucune preuve d'un effet combiné des structures physiques et du bruit ambiant sur l'ajustement vocal des deux espèces. Le changement de la fréquence minimale ou maximale a entraîné un rétrécissement correspondant de la largeur de bande des vocalisations des deux espèces. Nos résultats mettent en évidence comment les mêmes traits de vocalisation de différentes espèces d'oiseaux chanteurs peuvent être affectés différemment par de nouvelles pressions sélectives dans la communication acoustique qui surviennent dans les environnements urbains.

Difference in acoustic responses to urbanisation in two African passerines

Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities

Structural and acoustic properties of urbanized landscapes adversely affect bird communities in a tropical environment

Urbanization alters the song propagation of two human-commensal songbird species

Urban habitats and noise impact avian communities and shape vocal mimicry in a songbird

Acoustic preadaptation to transmit vocal individuality of savanna nightjars in noisy urban environments

Natural Patterns in the Dawn and Dusk Choruses of a Neotropical Songbird in Relation to an Urban Sound Environment

Contrasting morphometric responses to increasing urbanisation in congeneric sparrow species

Anthropogenic noise affects winter song structure of a long-distance migrant, Gambel’s white-crowned sparrow

Anthropogenic disturbance affects calling and collective behaviour in corvid roosts

Predictors of West African urban bird species richness and composition

The Acoustic adaptation hypothesis does not support the occurrence of common songs in a neotropical urban bird species

Savanna Nightjars (Caprimulgus affinis stictomus) adjust calling height to gain amplitude advantage in urban environments

Experimentally broadcast ocean surf and river noise alters birdsong

Evidence that multiple anthropogenic stressors cumulatively affect foraging and vigilance in an urban-living bird

Anthropogenic noise decreases urban songbird diversity and may contribute to homogenization

Anthropogenic noise affects vocalisation properties of the territorial song of Western Australian magpies

Anthropogenic double jeopardy: Urban noise and artificial light at night interact synergistically to influence abundance

Meta-analysis of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis reveals no support for the effect of vegetation structure on acoustic signalling across terrestrial vertebrates

An avian urban morphotype: how the city environment shapes great tit morphology at different life stages

A country‐wide examination of effects of urbanization on common birds