Abstract:BACKGROUND Heart rate variability (HRV) is used to assess cardiac health and autonomic nervous system capabilities. With the growing popularity of commercially available wearable technologies, the opportunity to unobtrusively measure HRV via photoplethysmography (PPG) is an attractive alternative to electrocardiogram (ECG), which serves as the gold standard. PPG measures blood flow within the vasculature using color intensity. However, PPG does not directly measure HRV; it measures pulse rate variability (PRV). Previous studies comparing consumer-grade PRV with HRV have demonstrated mixed results in short durations of activity under controlled conditions. Further research is required to determine the efficacy of PRV to estimate HRV under free-living conditions. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare PRV estimates obtained from a consumer-grade PPG sensor with HRV measurements from a portable ECG during unsupervised free-living conditions, including sleep, and examine factors influencing estimation, including measurement conditions and simple editing methods to limit motion artifacts. METHODS A total of 10 healthy adults were recruited. Data from a Microsoft Band 2 and a Shimmer3 ECG unit were recorded simultaneously using a smartphone. Participants wore the devices for >90 min during typical day-to-day activities and while sleeping. After filtering, ECG data were processed using a combination of discrete wavelet transforms and peak-finding methods to identify R-R intervals. P-P intervals were edited for deletion using methods based on outlier detection and by removing sections affected by motion artifacts. Common HRV metrics were compared, including mean N-N, SD of N-N intervals, percentage of subsequent differences >50 ms (pNN50), root mean square of successive differences, low-frequency power (LF), and high-frequency power. Validity was assessed using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson correlation coefficient ( R 2 ). RESULTS Data sets for 10 days and 9 corresponding nights were acquired. The mean RMSE was 182 ms (SD 48) during the day and 158 ms (SD 67) at night. R 2 ranged from 0.00 to 0.66, with 2 of 19 (2 nights) trials considered moderate, 7 of 19 (2 days, 5 nights) fair, and 10 of 19 (8 days, 2 nights) poor. Deleting sections thought to be affected by motion artifacts had a minimal impact on the accuracy of PRV measures. Significant HRV and PRV differences were found for LF during the day and R-R, SDNN, pNN50, and LF at night. For 8 of the 9 matched day and night data sets, R 2 values were higher at night ( P= .08). P-P intervals were less sensitive to rapid R-R interval changes. CONCLUSIONS Owing to overall poor concurrent validity and inconsistency among participant data, PRV was found to be a poor surrogate for HRV under free-living conditions. These findings suggest that free-living HRV measurements would benefit from examining alternate sensing methods, such as multiwavelength PPG and wearable ECG.

P040 Comparisons of Heart Rate Variability Indices Derived from the Sheet-type Device beneath the Mattress with those from the Electrocardiogram

Comparison of HRV Indices of ECG and BCG Signals

Comparison of heart rate variability measurements between ballistocardiogram and electrocardiography

Unsupervised Heart Rate Variability Estimation from Ballistocardiograms

Effects of Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Jitters on the Quality of Heart Rate Variability Features: A Simulation-Based Case Study in the Context of Sleep Staging

A comparison of photoplethysmography and ECG recording to analyse heart rate variability in healthy subjects

Measuring Heart Rate Variability in Free-Living Conditions Using Consumer-Grade Photoplethysmography: Validation Study

Comparison Of Valley-To-Valley And Peak-To-Peak Intervals From Photoplethysmographic Signals To Obtain Heart Rate Variability In The Sitting Position

Bed-based ballistocardiography system using flexible RFID sensors for non-invasive single- and dual-subject vital signs monitoring

Measuring Heart Rate Variability in Free-Living Conditions Using Consumer-Grade Photoplethysmography: Validation Study (Preprint)

Changepoint Detection in Heart Rate Variability Indices in Older Patients Without Cancer at End of Life Using Ballistocardiography Signals: Preliminary Retrospective Study

A Statistical Comparison of Heart Rate Variability Measurements Between Devices: Chest Strap Versus Finger Probe.

Novel heart rate variability index for wrist-worn wearable devices subject to motion artifacts that complicate measurement of the continuous pulse interval

Heart rate detection method based on Ballistocardiogram signal of wearable device：Algorithm development and validation

Assessment of Physiological Signals from Photoplethysmography Sensors Compared to an Electrocardiogram Sensor: A Validation Study in Daily Life

Agreement between Vital Signs Measured Using Mat-Type Noncontact Sensors and Those from Conventional Clinical Assessment

Day-to-day reliability of basal heart rate and short-term and ultra short-term heart rate variability assessment by the Equivital eq02+ LifeMonitor in US Army soldiers

Blood pressure monitoring with piezoelectric bed sensor systems

Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients

A Ballistocardiogram Measurement System for Home Monitoring: Design, Performance, and Evaluation

A Personalized Beat-to-Beat Heart Rate Detection System from Ballistocardiogram for Smart Home Applications