Abstract:The Sociological Review, Ahead of Print. Mainstream poverty analysis currently renders certain people and degrees of privation more socially legible than others across high-income countries. This article examines how these hierarchies carry through to and corrupt wider social scientific analysis, inscribing differential value to actors and phenomena in ways that undermine social understanding and explanation. First, conventional approaches to poverty analysis and measurement obscure the de facto prevalence of deep poverty, as well as those most subject to its violence. Second, a growing number of hyper-marginalised groups are missing from population income surveys, undermining the accuracy of (deep) poverty estimates and public understanding of both its determinants and dynamics. Third, the inferential and external validity of income surveys is significantly diminished by problems surrounding data quality and coverage. Attempts to address this have principally focused on improving data quality, but as demonstrated in this article, these strategies exacerbate poor representation of the lowest-income groups in distributional analysis. Much more than merely technical or pragmatic, these are theoretical and normative judgements about who counts in welfare policy and politics. Overall, I demonstrate how current data practices occlude some the most violent forms of denigration and exploitation that structure advanced marginality, particularly the gendered, racialised, bordering and ableist practices underpinning state–citizen dynamics. Focusing principally on the UK context, I argue that the epistemic erasure committed features in and systematises a policy blindness to deep poverty for some of the most marginalised social groups making it harder to evidence its effects and address its causes across high-income countries.

Inequality snowballing

How Rising Income Inequality Threatens Access to the Legal System

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

The Influence of Inequality on Welfare Generosity

Inequality, Lobbying, and Resource Allocation

Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich

Are there inequality spillovers? Evidence through a modified inequality measure and European dynamics of inequality

The crime of being poor

Noisy law: Scaling without a modulus

Effect of segregation on inequality in kinetic models of wealth exchange

How Much Income Inequality Is Too Much?

Inequality of Opportunity and Income Redistribution

Equal opportunities lead to maximum wealth inequality

Inequality begets inequality: Income inequality and socioeconomic achievement gradients across the United States

Who counts in poverty research?

Poverty, redistribution, and the middle class: redistribution via probability distributions vs. redistribution via the linear income tax system

Criminal Justice Reform and Inequality

The Dynamics of Disparity: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Income and Wealth Inequality and Policy Interventions for Mitigation

Settlements Under Unequal Access to Justice

Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour

Financial accumulation implies ever-increasing wealth inequality