Abstract:The energy balance at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and at the surface of the earth plays an essential role in the Earth's climate change. The Clouds and Earth Radiant Energy System (CERES) can directly measure the energy radiation at the TOA, while the surface energy balance needs to be estimated by satellite retrievals and atmospheric reanalysis. Some key fluxes need to be adjusted artificially to close the surface energy balance, particularly the surface latent and sensible heat fluxes. Existing studies have used the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) dataset to estimate latent heat flux and have adjusted it artificially to balance the surface energy. Based on high-precision ground-based and satellite observations, this study evaluates the ability of the new generation of atmospheric reanalyses to quantify the global energy balance and provides the optimal estimation of the global, terrestrial, and oceanic radiation fluxes at the TOA and the surface during the period 2015-2020. Additionally, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) products are combined to provide the best estimates of the surface latent heat flux. The global mean TOA incident solar radiation from the new generation of reanalyses is in good agreement with that from CERES. However, due to the addition of atmospheric tide analysis, the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) has a harmonic oscillation pattern that appears near the equator; the errors cancel out after taking the global mean, but the results still have a significant overestimation of 6 W m(-2) over land. On the global scale, it is found that the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications V2 (MERRA2) overestimates the TOA reflected solar radiation by 8 W m(-2), and the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA55) overestimates the TOA outgoing longwave radiation by 10 W m(-2), which is most significant over the tropical ocean. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis of Atmosphere Version 5 (ERA5) can reproduce the TOA energy imbalance well (1.1 W m(-2)), while the estimates of the other three reanalyses are 5.4 W m(-2) (CFSR), -10.7 W m(-2) (JRA55), and -4.1 W m(-2) (MERRA2). All of the TOA radiation fluxes of the reanalyses over the ocean are consistent with those at the global scale, and the ERA5 results are still the best. The best estimates of the surface incident solar radiation and downward longwave radiation from CERES and ERA5 are 187 and 342 W m(-2), respectively. Additionally, due to atmospheric tidal analysis, CFSR seriously overestimates the surface incident solar radiation, JRA55 and MERRA2 yield overestimates over land, and MERRA2 seriously underestimates the surface downward longwave radiation. Compared with the latest GPM products, the existing precipitation estimates based on GPCP underestimate global precipitation by 8.4%, mainly due to the substantial underestimation of precipitation over the ocean, which helps to close the global surface energy balance. Based on the GPM and the estimation of runoff into the ocean, we conclude that the optimal estimates of surface latent heat flux over the globe, over the land, and over the ocean are 83, 41, and 101 W m(-2), respectively. The global and oceanic latent heat fluxes of JRA55 are overestimated by 10 and 13 W m(-2), respectively, while the other three reanalyses are within reasonable ranges. According to the evaluation results, this study provides the optimal estimation of each component of the surface energy balance, which can reach surface energy closure without artificial adjustment.

Comprehensive assessment of global atmospheric downward longwave radiation in the state-of-the-art reanalysis using satellite and flux tower observations

Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all-sky conditions from 1973 to 2008

Evaluations Of Atmospheric Downward Longwave Radiation From 44 Coupled General Circulation Models Of Cmip5

Global Atmospheric Downward Longwave Radiation at the Surface from Ground-Based Observations, Satellite Retrievals, and Reanalyses

Does ERA5 outperform satellite products in estimating atmospheric downward longwave radiation at the surface?

Estimating Surface Downward Longwave Radiation Using Machine Learning Methods

Assessment of the Long-Term High-Spatial-Resolution Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) Surface Longwave Radiation Product Using Ground Measurements

Towards user-friendly all-sky surface longwave downward radiation from space: General scheme and product

Evaluation of Multi-Reanalysis Solar Radiation Products Using Global Surface Observations

Updating Global Energy Balance Based on the Latest Observations and Reanalyses

Significant discrepancies of land surface daily net radiation among ten remotely sensed and reanalysis products

Integrating Reanalysis and Satellite Cloud Information to Estimate Surface Downward Long-Wave Radiation

A review and comparison of surface incident shortwave radiation from multiple data sources: satellite retrievals, reanalysis data and GCM simulations

Merging Satellite Retrievals and Reanalyses to Produce Global Long-Term and Consistent Surface Incident Solar Radiation Datasets

Evaluation of Downward Surface Longwave Flux Estimates Using Meteosat Cloud Observations

Comparison of CERES Surface Radiation Fluxes with Surface Observations over Loess Plateau

Discrepancies in the Simulated Global Terrestrial Latent Heat Flux from GLASS and MERRA-2 Surface Net Radiation Products

Trends and Variability of Atmospheric Downward Longwave Radiation over China from 1958 to 2015

Does the Modern‐era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications‐2 Aerosol Reanalysis Introduce an Improvement in the Simulation of Surface Solar Radiation over China?

A New Benchmark for Surface Radiation Products over the East Asia–Pacific Region Retrieved from the Himawari-8/AHI Next-Generation Geostationary Satellite

Global Land Surface Temperature Change (2003-2017) and Its Relationship with Climate Drivers: AIRS, MODIS, and ERA5-Land Based Analysis