Gradient Descent-Based Objective Function Reformulation for Finite Control Set Model Predictive Current Control With Extended Horizon

Haotian Xie,Lei Liu,Yingjie He,Fengxiang Wang,Ralph Kennel,Jose Rodriguez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2021.3116567
IF: 7.7
2022-09-01
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Abstract:This article proposes a novel objective function formulation based on gradient descent (GD) for finite control set predictive current control (FCS-PCC) with extended horizon. FCS-PCC has become increasingly attractive for electrical drive applications owing to its short settling time, lower switching frequency, capability to handle multiple conflicting targets, and feasible inclusion of constraints. However, it still suffers from high-torque ripple and poor current quality at the steady state. To tackle the aforementioned issue, a GD-based objective function reformulation is employed in the FCS-PCC with extended horizon. First, the optimization problem underlying FCS-PCC is formulated as a constrained quadratic programming problem with proved convexity from a geometric perspective. Based on the above, the tracking error of the control objective is minimized more efficiently by searching along the direction of GD. Consequently, the objective function is reconstructed as the deviation between the normalized GD and derivative, combined with the extension of feasible set. The abovementioned procedures are iteratively learned in every prediction horizon. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified on a 2.2-kW induction machine platform with a prediction horizon of <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.064ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 888.5 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-4E" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span> = 3. It is confirmed that the proposed algorithm outperforms the conventional and multistep FCS-PCC in steady state and transient state.<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-4E" d="M234 637Q231 637 226 637Q201 637 196 638T191 649Q191 676 202 682Q204 683 299 683Q376 683 387 683T401 677Q612 181 616 168L670 381Q723 592 723 606Q723 633 659 637Q635 637 635 648Q635 650 637 660Q641 676 643 679T653 683Q656 683 684 682T767 680Q817 680 843 681T873 682Q888 682 888 672Q888 650 880 642Q878 637 858 637Q787 633 769 597L620 7Q618 0 599 0Q585 0 582 2Q579 5 453 305L326 604L261 344Q196 88 196 79Q201 46 268 46H278Q284 41 284 38T282 19Q278 6 272 0H259Q228 2 151 2Q123 2 100 2T63 2T46 1Q31 1 31 10Q31 14 34 26T39 40Q41 46 62 46Q130 49 150 85Q154 91 221 362L289 634Q287 635 234 637Z"></path></defs></svg>
automation & control systems,engineering, electrical & electronic,instruments & instrumentation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?