Zeolite Amendment Coupled with Alternate Wetting and Drying to Reduce Nitrogen Loss and Enhance Rice Production
Yidi Sun,Guimin Xia,Zhenli He,Qi Wu,Junlin Zheng,Yinghao Li,Yanzhi Wang,Taotao Chen,Daocai Chi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.004
IF: 5.8
2019-01-01
Field Crops Research
Abstract:Clinoptilolite zeolite (Z) has been increasingly recognized as a valuable soil conditioner, which is beneficial to nitrogen (N) loss reduction and crop yield improvement. However, limited information is available for a rice production system, especially under alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD). Therefore, a 2-year field experiment with lysimeter was carried out in a split plot design with two irrigation regimes (CF: continuously flooded irrigation, AWD: alternate wetting and drying irrigation) as main plots and three Z amendment rates (0, 5 and 10 t Z ha(-1)) as sub-plots. The impact of Z amendment on ammonia (NH3) volatilization, N leaching, rice grain yield, water productivity (WP) and economic benefit were analyzed under both irrigation regimes. The results showed that AWD slightly reduced NH3 volatilization without Z application, but significantly increased residual mineral N (RMN) in soil at the depths of 0 - 30 and 30 - 60 cm, and NH4+ -N and NO3--N leaching, relative to CF. AWD-grown rice significantly improved WP without affecting grain yield in 2016, but reduced yield in 2017 without Z amendment. Compared with control (without Z amendment), addition of 5 and 10 t Z ha(-1) increased RMN by 12 and 21%, respectively in the 0 - 30 cm soil depth, but reduced it by 18 and 32%, respectively in the 30 - 60 cm soil depth. Total NH3 volatilization and NH4+ -N and NO3--N leaching loss decreased with increasing rates of Z amendment. Z amendment significantly increased N uptake, rice grain yield, economic benefit and WP, especially under AWD. In the two years, integration of 10 t Z ha(-1) with either AWD or CF management reduced NH3 volatilization without increasing N leaching and increased rice grain yield and WP, with an increased economic benefit of $126 - 195 ha(-1), as compared to conventional management (CF without Z). The use of zeolite merits further investigation for application in the rice production systems.