Abstract:Peer assessment is a common pedagogical practice for evaluating students' writing in college English classrooms. However, in-depth research on the learning outcomes after peer assessment is scarce and inconsistent; how peer feedback is used has not been fully explored either. This study compared peer feedback to teacher feedback and explored the different features of feedback and its impact on draft revision. Two specific research questions were answered in this study: (1) In which aspects can peer feedback supplement teacher feedback in improving the linguistic features in writing? (2) What are the differences in features of peer feedback versus teacher feedback? And how do they connect to feedback take-in? Two writing tasks were assigned to 94 students. One received teacher feedback and the other peer feedback. Pre-feedback and post-feedback writings in both tasks (4 sets in total) were scored and human ratings were adjusted using Many-Facet Rasch modeling to control for differences in leniency. Drawing on three natural language processing (NLP) tools, this study also assessed writing qualities by comparing 22 selected indices related to the scoring rubrics for human raters, which involve three dimensions: cohesion, lexical quality and syntactic complexity. Peer and teacher feedback was then coded based on features of feedback to explore their influence on draft revision. The results showed that both peer and teacher feedback had positive effects on rating scores. We confirmed peer feedback as an effective classroom approach to improve writing, though limited compared to teacher feedback as reflected in the indices. In terms of feedback features, students often stopped at identifying the language problems, while the teacher provided more explanations, solutions or suggestions regarding the problems identified. Implications for peer feedback research and implementation of peer assessment activities are provided.

Steps to implementation: the role of peer feedback inner structure on feedback implementation

Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement

Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment

Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity: An ethnographic study of Exploratory Practice

Investigating the Impact of Structured Knowledge Feedback on Collaborative Academic Writing

From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions

The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback

Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback

Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward?

Feedback Seeking by First-Year Chinese International Students: Understanding Practices and Challenges

Study on Students’ Engagement of Different Writing Levels in the Process of Peer Feedback of English Writing in the Junior High School

Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning

Iterative Design and Classroom Evaluation of Automated Formative Feedback for Improving Peer Feedback Localization

Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: a case study of Chinese undergraduate students

Peer Feedback in Translation Training: A Quasi-Experiment in an Advanced Chinese–English Translation Course

Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing

Students’ Peer Feedback in EFL Writing Class of English Study Program

Developing Student Feedback Literacy Through Peer Review Training

Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships