Abstract:The Turing Test (TT) checks for human intelligence, rather than any putative general intelligence. It involves repeated interaction requiring learning in the form of adaption to the human conversation partner. It is a macro-level post-hoc test in contrast to the definition of a Turing Machine (TM), which is a prior micro-level definition. This raises the question of whether learning is just another computational process, i.e. can be implemented as a TM. Here we argue that learning or adaption is fundamentally different from computation, though it does involve processes that can be seen as computations. To illustrate this difference we compare (a) designing a TM and (b) learning a TM, defining them for the purpose of the argument. We show that there is a well-defined sequence of problems which are not effectively designable but are learnable, in the form of the bounded halting problem. Some characteristics of human intelligence are reviewed including it's: interactive nature, learning abilities, imitative tendencies, linguistic ability and context-dependency. A story that explains some of these is the Social Intelligence Hypothesis. If this is broadly correct, this points to the necessity of a considerable period of acculturation (social learning in context) if an artificial intelligence is to pass the TT. Whilst it is always possible to 'compile' the results of learning into a TM, this would not be a designed TM and would not be able to continually adapt (pass future TTs). We conclude three things, namely that: a purely "designed" TM will never pass the TT; that there is no such thing as a general intelligence since it necessary involves learning; and that learning/adaption and computation should be clearly distinguished.

The Patchwork Divergence Theorem

Learning, Social Intelligence and the Turing Test - why an "out-of-the-box" Turing Machine will not pass the Turing Test

The Turing Test and our shifting conceptions of intelligence

Hard to Cheat: A Turing Test based on Answering Questions about Images

Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test

Turing Test Revisited: A Framework for an Alternative

The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment

Some Cognitive Aspects of a Turing Test for Children

Intelligence as a Social Concept: a Socio-Technological Interpretation of the Turing Test

Beyond Turing: Testing LLMs for Intelligence

The Meta-Turing Test

Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment

Turing Test and the Practice of Law: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning

Deceptive Appearances: the Turing Test, Response-Dependence, and Intelligence as an Emotional Concept

Children Turing Test and Commonsense Knowledge Processing

A Closer Look at the Limitations of Instruction Tuning

The Turing Deception

Towards a theory of consciousness: Proposal for the resolution of the homunculus fallacy with predictions

Self-Directed Turing Test for Large Language Models

Human or Not? A Gamified Approach to the Turing Test

Turing Test for the Internet of Things