Abstract:The Turing Test (TT) checks for human intelligence, rather than any putative general intelligence. It involves repeated interaction requiring learning in the form of adaption to the human conversation partner. It is a macro-level post-hoc test in contrast to the definition of a Turing Machine (TM), which is a prior micro-level definition. This raises the question of whether learning is just another computational process, i.e. can be implemented as a TM. Here we argue that learning or adaption is fundamentally different from computation, though it does involve processes that can be seen as computations. To illustrate this difference we compare (a) designing a TM and (b) learning a TM, defining them for the purpose of the argument. We show that there is a well-defined sequence of problems which are not effectively designable but are learnable, in the form of the bounded halting problem. Some characteristics of human intelligence are reviewed including it's: interactive nature, learning abilities, imitative tendencies, linguistic ability and context-dependency. A story that explains some of these is the Social Intelligence Hypothesis. If this is broadly correct, this points to the necessity of a considerable period of acculturation (social learning in context) if an artificial intelligence is to pass the TT. Whilst it is always possible to 'compile' the results of learning into a TM, this would not be a designed TM and would not be able to continually adapt (pass future TTs). We conclude three things, namely that: a purely "designed" TM will never pass the TT; that there is no such thing as a general intelligence since it necessary involves learning; and that learning/adaption and computation should be clearly distinguished.

The Turing Test and our shifting conceptions of intelligence

Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test

The Human-or-Machine Matter: Turing-Inspired Reflections on an Everyday Issue

Intelligence as a Social Concept: a Socio-Technological Interpretation of the Turing Test

The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment

Turing Test Revisited: A Framework for an Alternative

Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment

Alan Turing and Human-Like Intelligence

Deceptive Appearances: the Turing Test, Response-Dependence, and Intelligence as an Emotional Concept

Hard to Cheat: A Turing Test based on Answering Questions about Images

Learning, Social Intelligence and the Turing Test - why an "out-of-the-box" Turing Machine will not pass the Turing Test

Passed the Turing Test: Living in Turing Futures

The Meta-Turing Test

The Turing Deception

Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing Tests for Vision and Language Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap

Building Thinking Machines by Solving Animal Cognition Tasks

Alan Turing and the "Hard" and "Easy" Problem of Cognition: Doing and Feeling

Can Turing machine be curious about its Turing test results? Three informal lectures on physics of intelligence

Can I say, now machines can think?

Industrial Turing Test: Concept and Practice.

Turing Test for the Internet of Things