Differential Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured After Coronary Stent Implantation by Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Ki Hong Choi,Woochan Kwon,Doosup Shin,Seung-Hun Lee,Doyeon Hwang,Jinlong Zhang,Chang-Wook Nam,Eun-Seok Shin,Joon-Hyung Doh,Shao-Liang Chen,Tsunekazu Kakuta,Gabor G Toth,Zsolt Piroth,Abdul Hakeem,Barry F Uretsky,Yohei Hokama,Nobuhiro Tanaka,Hong-Seok Lim,Tsuyoshi Ito,Akiko Matsuo,Lorenzo Azzalini,Massoud A Leesar,Joost Daemen,Damien Collison,Carlos Collet,Bernard De Bruyne,Bon-Kwon Koo,Taek Kyu Park,Jeong Hoon Yang,Young Bin Song,Joo-Yong Hahn,Seung-Hyuk Choi,Hyeon-Cheol Gwon,Joo Myung Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.10.009
2023-12-12
JACC Asia
Abstract:Background: Both left ventricular systolic function and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are prognostic factors after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, how these prognostic factors are inter-related in risk stratification of patients after PCI remains unclarified. Objectives: This study evaluated differential prognostic implication of post-PCI FFR according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A total of 2,965 patients with available LVEF were selected from the POST-PCI FLOW (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent) international registry of patients with post-PCI FFR measurement. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) at 2 years. The secondary outcome was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, TVMI, or TVR. Results: Post-PCI FFR was independently associated with the risk of target vessel failure (per 0.01 decrease: HRadj: 1.029; 95% CI: 1.009-1.049; P = 0.005). Post-PCI FFR was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI (HRadj: 1.145; 95% CI: 1.025-1.280; P = 0.017) among patients with LVEF ≤40%, and with that of TVR in patients with LVEF >40% (HRadj: 1.028; 95% CI: 1.005-1.052; P = 0.020). Post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI in the LVEF ≤40% group and with that of TVR in LVEF >40% group. Prognostic impact of post-PCI FFR for the primary outcome was significantly different according to LVEF (Pinteraction = 0.019). Conclusions: Post-PCI FFR had differential prognostic impact according to LVEF. Residual ischemia by post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was a prognostic indicator for cardiac death or TVMI among patients with patients with LVEF ≤40%, and it was associated with TVR among patients with patients with LVEF>40%. (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent [POST-PCI FLOW]; NCT04684043).