Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery
Carlos Collet,Nils P Johnson,Takuya Mizukami,William F Fearon,Colin Berry,Jeroen Sonck,Damien Collison,Bon-Kwon Koo,Nicolas Meneveau,Shiv Kumar Agarwal,Barry Uretsky,Abdul Hakeem,Joon-Hyung Doh,Bruno R Da Costa,Keith G Oldroyd,Jonathon A Leipsic,Umberto Morbiducci,Charles Taylor,Brian Ko,Pim A L Tonino,Divaka Perera,Toshiro Shinke,Claudio Chiastra,Andrei C Sposito,Antonio Maria Leone,Olivier Muller,Stephane Fournier,Hitoshi Matsuo,Julien Adjedj,Nicolas Amabile,Zsolt Piróth,Fernando Alfonso,Fernando Rivero,Jung-Min Ahn,Gabor G Toth,Abdul Ihdayhid,Nick E J West,Tetsuya Amano,Eric Wyffels,Daniel Munhoz,Marta Belmonte,Hirofumi Ohashi,Koshiro Sakai,Emanuele Gallinoro,Emanuele Barbato,Thomas Engstrøm,Javier Escaned,Ziad A Ali,Morton J Kern,Nico H J Pijls,Peter Jüni,Bernard De Bruyne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.018
2023-10-09
Abstract:Background: Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated. Objectives: This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery. Methods: We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Results: Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005). Conclusions: The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels.