Nanosafety evaluation through feces: A comparison between selenium nanoparticles and selenite in rats

Xiaoying Lin,Liming Wang,Jiating Zhao,Lina He,Liwei Cui,Yuxi Gao,Chunying Chen,Yuqin Fan,Bai Li,Yu-Feng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101010
IF: 17.4
2021-02-01
Nano Today
Abstract:<p>Nanosafety evaluation is necessary not only for nanomaterials research and development but also as a cornerstone for legal regulation. In this study, we proposed a non-invasive protocol for nanosafety evaluation through feces using metagenomics and metabolomics together with metallomics. Male SD rats were orally exposed to equal amounts of Se (Se<sup>0</sup>NPs, 3.14 or Na<sub>2</sub>SeO<sub>3</sub>, 6.28 μg/kg bw) and were sacrificed after 24 h. 16S rRNA analysis and LC–MS were used to study the impact of different forms of Se on intestinal microbiota and metabolites in fecal samples. ICP-MS and synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence (SR-XRF) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) were used to study the concentration and transformation of Se in gastrointestinal track and feces. It was found that Se<sup>0</sup>NPs brought less alternation to the composition of intestinal microbiota and metabolites related to inflammation, immunity and gut-brain axis related responses than Na<sub>2</sub>SeO<sub>3</sub> did. Besides, the absorbed Se<sup>0</sup>NPs could be more efficiently converted to organic Se which explained the comparable bioavailability to Na<sub>2</sub>SeO<sub>3</sub>. In all, the proposed protocol combined with metagenomics, metabolomics and metallomics in this study can be used for nanosafety evaluation in a non-invasive manner and this may also be used for the screening of the nanosafety of other nanomaterials.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology,chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?