Can Double J stent encrustation be predicted by risk analysis and nomogram?: A retrospective case–control study
Zicheng Liu,Minbo Yan,Yaser Naji,Junliang Qiu,Haojie Wang,Yuteng Lin,Yingbo Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000035303
IF: 1.6
2024-01-13
Medicine
Abstract:In the field of endourology today, Double J stenting has become one of the most commonly performed procedures for decompressing and relieving upper urinary tract obstruction. However, it is well-known that an indwelling Double J ureteric stent carries various complications, including stent encrustation, stone formation, hematuria, urinary tract infection, stent misplacement, and stent extraction failure. [ 1 ] Among these, the occurrences of stent encrustation and stone formation are particularly significant, as they can even develop within 1 to 2 weeks after insertion. [ 2 ] Once encrustation occurs, the stent becomes fragile and loses its flexibility, thereby increasing the risk of stent fracture and ureteral injuries during removal. Furthermore, stent encrustation can exacerbate lower urinary tract symptoms, secondary obstruction, infection, and impair renal function. [ 3 ] In severe cases, where encrustation spreads throughout the entire stent forming a Dumbbell-shaped structure, acute renal failure, sepsis and septic shock, and even death may occur. The management of Double J stent encrustation involves multimodular approaches such as extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with endoscopic intervention and even open surgeries. [ 4–6 ] These interventions impose significant physical and mental burdens on patients while adding to the strain on healthcare systems.
medicine, general & internal