Abstract:Introduction: We present our experience of the endourological management of encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and a literature review on forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. Methods: A total of 13 encrusted ureteral stents from 12 patients were removed in two hospitals. The medical records were retrospectively analyzed for stent indication, indwelling time, clinical presentation, investigations, type and the number of surgical procedures, operative time, complications, duration of hospital stay, and the follow-up. Results: Five ureteral stents (US) inserted before ESWL (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy) for renal stones, seven US for ureteric stones with ureteric colic, and one ureteral stent for post ureteroscopy procedure. The mean indwelling time was 15.07 ± 7.34 months with a range from 6 to 24 months. The mean Kidney,Ureter and Bladder (KUB) score of encrusta-tion grading was 11.84 ± 2.07 with a range from 9 to 15. The encrusted stents were removed by a combination of cystolithotripsy, semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and ESWL. The average total number of procedures to remove one EUS was 3 ± 1.08 with a range of 2 to 5 proce-dures. Six encrusted stents were removed in one, ﬁve stents required two, one stent required three and one stent required four hospital admissions. The median operative time was 210 minutes with a range of 60 to 660 minutes per EUS removal and the mean hospital stay was 2.69 ± 1.43 days with a range of 1 to 6 days. All patients had successful removal of encrusted stent and complete stone clearance with no major complica-tions. In the follow-up, one patient had recurrent ureteric stone, one patient on regular stent exchange due to poor renal function and one patient developed signiﬁcant ureteric stricture referred for reconstruction. Conclusions: Removal of forgotten encrusted impacted ureteral stents is challenging and requires a multimodal surgical approach. It adds signiﬁcant costs to the health care system and in addition it affects patient safety and quality of life. Patient education, avoiding unnecessary ureteral stent place-ment and a computerized stent monitoring system reduces the incidence of forgotten ureteral stents and their complications.

Innovation and new technology in ureteral stents

Innovations in Ureteral Stent Technology

New insights into the prevention of ureteral stents encrustation

Ureteral stent-associated complications—where we are and where we are going

Polymers as Ureteral Stents

Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Recent development and future application of biodegradable ureteral stents

Surface modification of ureteral stents: development history, classification, function, and future developments

Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: A review of literature

Bioabsorbable ureteral stents: current state-of-the-art

The use of internal stents in chronic ureteral obstruction

The "ins and outs" of the magnetic ureteral stent: A novel innovation in Endourology

Current material engineering strategies to prevent catheter encrustation in urinary tracts

Metal Stents in the Urinary Tract

Prostatic stents: a narrative review of current evidence

Bridging the knowledge gap: past, present and future of antibiotic use for ureteral stents

The interplay between bacterial biofilms, encrustation, and wall shear stress in ureteral stents: a review across scales

A Retrievable Polymer Urethral Stent for Treatment of Urethral Strictures

A Novel Thermo-Expandable Ureteral Metal Stent for the Minimally Invasive Management of Ureteral Strictures

Management of encrusted ureteral stents: Two center experience

(185) Self-Expandable, Metallic, Ptfa-Covered Urethral Stent With Anti-Migration Flaps (Uventa). Complication Report And Outcomes From The Largest Multicenter Series