Abstract:In the post-crisis era, financial regulators and policymakers are increasingly interested in data-driven tools to measure systemic risk and to identify systemically important firms. Granger Causality (GC) based techniques to build networks among financial firms using time series of their stock returns have received significant attention in recent years. Existing GC network methods model conditional means, and do not distinguish between connectivity in lower and upper tails of the return distribution - an aspect crucial for systemic risk analysis. We propose statistical methods that measure connectivity in the financial sector using system-wide tail-based analysis and is able to distinguish between connectivity in lower and upper tails of the return distribution. This is achieved using bivariate and multivariate GC analysis based on regular and Lasso penalized quantile regressions, an approach we call quantile Granger causality (QGC). By considering centrality measures of these financial networks, we can assess the build-up of systemic risk and identify risk propagation channels. We provide an asymptotic theory of QGC estimators under a quantile vector autoregressive model, and show its benefit over regular GC analysis on simulated data. We apply our method to the monthly stock returns of large U.S. firms and demonstrate that lower tail based networks can detect systemically risky periods in historical data with higher accuracy than mean-based networks. In a similar analysis of large Indian banks, we find that upper and lower tail networks convey different information and have the potential to distinguish between periods of high connectivity that are governed by positive vs negative news in the market.

Quantile connectedness and the determinants between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from China

Risk spillovers between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from the U.S.

Extreme risk spillovers among traditional financial and FinTech institutions: A complex network perspective

Quantile interdependence and network connectedness between China's green financial and energy markets

The cross-sector risk contagion among Chinese financial institutions: Evidence from the extreme volatility spillover perspective

Partial Cross-Quantilogram Networks: Measuring Quantile Connectedness of Financial Institutions

Quantile volatility connectedness among themes and sectors: Novel evidence from China

FinTech Adoption and Bank Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks

How FinTech Affects Bank Systemic Risk: Evidence from China

Business connectedness or market risk? Evidence from financial institutions in China

Quantile connectedness of the Chinese commodity sectors

Network effects on risk co-movements: A network quantile autoregression-based analysis

Quantile connectedness between China's new energy market and other key financial markets

Salience theory value spillovers between China's systemically important banks: evidence from quantile connectedness

Quantifying interconnectedness and centrality ranking among financial institutions with TVP-VAR framework

Heterogeneous dependence of the FinTech Index with Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)

Linkages and Spillovers between Internet Finance and Traditional Finance: Evidence from China

Value‐at‐Risk with quantile regression neural network: New evidence from internet finance firms

Exploring Financial Networks Using Quantile Regression and Granger Causality

Effect of COVID-19 on risk spillover between fintech and traditional financial industries