Business connectedness or market risk? Evidence from financial institutions in China

Qi Liang,Yanchen Lu,Zheng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101503
IF: 4.744
2020-08-01
China Economic Review
Abstract:<p>We utilize the spectral representation of generalized forecast error variance decomposition to investigate the frequency dynamics of volatility connectedness and systemic risk of financial institutions in China from 2011 to 2018. We find that, first, high-frequency components account for the largest part of volatility connectedness (48.33%), followed by low-frequency components, and finally the medium-frequency components. Second, the low-frequency components reflect the business connectedness among financial institutions, while the high-frequency components capture the market risk. Third, the business connectedness among financial institutions will lead to a rise in overall connectedness as well as the accumulation of potential risks. Further, once a crisis breaks out, the potential risks have realized and the business connectedness among institutions declines; while market risk increases rapidly, which helps systemic financial risk stay at a high level. Lastly, among the financial sectors, the banking sector possesses a relatively higher level of business connectedness which plays an important role in the accumulation of potential financial risks; the securities sector features with higher market risk; while the insurance sector has both comparatively lower business connectedness and market risk.</p>
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to distinguish between business connectedness and market risk among financial institutions in the financial system, and further explore their roles in systemic financial risk. Specifically, by introducing the time - frequency framework, the paper decomposes volatility connectedness into different frequency components to reveal the actual business connectedness reflected by the low - frequency components and the market risk reflected by the high - frequency components. The following are the specific problems that the paper attempts to solve: 1. **Distinguishing between business connectedness and market risk** - The paper points out that when using stock price data to measure the connectedness among financial institutions, the results may contain both institution - specific information (reflecting actual business connectedness) and market information (reflecting market risk). Therefore, a method is needed to clearly distinguish between the two. - Through frequency - domain analysis, the author finds that the low - frequency components mainly reflect business connectedness, while the high - frequency components mainly reflect market risk. 2. **The dynamic evolution process of systemic financial risk** - How does business connectedness lead to an increase in overall connectedness and the accumulation of potential risks? - After the outbreak of a crisis, business connectedness declines, but market risk rises rapidly, thus maintaining systemic financial risk at a high level. 3. **Characteristic analysis of different financial sectors** - The banking industry has a high level of business connectedness and plays an important role in the accumulation of potential financial risks. - The securities industry has a high level of market risk, and the market risk will increase significantly during a crisis. - The insurance industry has low levels of both business connectedness and market risk. 4. **Providing policy recommendations** - By in - depth analysis of the economic implications of different frequency components, the paper provides regulators with a more accurate and comprehensive perspective, helping them better understand and manage the connectedness among financial institutions and systemic financial risk. ### Summary The main objective of the paper is to decompose volatility connectedness into different frequency components through frequency - domain analysis methods, and clearly distinguish between business connectedness and market risk, thereby revealing their roles in the formation and evolution of systemic financial risk. This not only helps the academic community to have a deeper understanding of the complexity of the financial system, but also provides important policy references for regulators.