Abstract:As one of the important participants in the market, the role of institutional investors has attracted more and more attention. Based on the perspective of cash holding value, the author takes Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share non-financial listed companies from 2001 to 2019 as research samples to empirically investigate the governance effect of heterogeneous institutional investors, and explore its mechanism of action. The research results show: The holdings of pressure-resistant institutional investors increase the value of cash holdings and have a positive governance effect; the holdings of pressure-sensitive institutional investors reduce the value of cash holdings and have a negative governance effect. Further analysis shows that: High equity concentration weakens the positive governance effect of pressure-resistant institutional investors, and pressure-resistant institutional investors play the role of “supervisor”. High equity concentration and management shareholding ratio increase the negative governance effect of pressure-sensitive institutional investors, the high proportion of independent directors alleviates the negative governance effect of pressure-sensitive institutional investors. The pressure-sensitive institutional investors play the role of “conspirators”. Pressure-resistant institutional investors play a positive governance role in both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors mainly play a negative governance role in state-owned enterprises. The robustness test shows that the above conclusions are still valid. The mechanism discussion excludes that institutional investors influence the value of cash holdings by influencing the degree of corporate financing constraints. The pressure-resistant institutional investors, playing a positive governance role, have no significant impact on the level of cash holdings and inefficient investment and increase the value of cash holdings mainly by improving enterprises’ innovation activities. Although institutional investors increase the level of cash holdings, they also reduce enterprises’ innovation activities and improve non-efficient investment, thus reducing the value of cash holdings and playing a negative governance role.

The Effects of Banking Market Structure on Corporate Cash Holdings and the Value of Cash

Family control and corporate cash holdings: evidence from China

Trust and Corporate Cash Holdings

Firm Structure and Corporate Cash Holdings

Measuring The Management Of Cash Flows From Operating Activities-Evidence From Chinese Capital Markets

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash

Managing liquidity along the supply chain: Supplier‐base concentration and corporate cash policy

Cash holdings, the internal capital market, and capital allocation efficiency in listed companies

Digital Technologies, Investor Sentiment, Limits to Arbitrage and Value of Firm Cash Holdings in China's A Stock Market is Good

Does ownership structure matter? Evidence from firms' excess cash in China

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

The effect of market competition on corporate cash holdings: An analysis of corporate innovation and financial constraint

Does Corporate Governance Affect Corporate Cash Holdings -- Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Cash Holdings, Capital Structure, and Financing Risk

The sensitivity of corporate cash holdings to corporate governance

The Effect of Drinking Culture on Corporate Cash Holdings

Do Local Protestant Values Affect Corporate Cash Holdings?

The Governance Effect of Institutional Investors:From the Perspective of Cash Holding Value

Cash Holding, Rollover Risk and M&A

Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms