The Governance Effect of Institutional Investors:From the Perspective of Cash Holding Value

HU Ya-feng,FENG Ke,DENG Guo-sheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13902/j.cnki.syyj.2022.06.001

2022-01-01

Abstract:As one of the important participants in the market, the role of institutional investors has attracted more and more attention. Based on the perspective of cash holding value, the author takes Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share non-financial listed companies from 2001 to 2019 as research samples to empirically investigate the governance effect of heterogeneous institutional investors, and explore its mechanism of action. The research results show: The holdings of pressure-resistant institutional investors increase the value of cash holdings and have a positive governance effect; the holdings of pressure-sensitive institutional investors reduce the value of cash holdings and have a negative governance effect. Further analysis shows that: High equity concentration weakens the positive governance effect of pressure-resistant institutional investors, and pressure-resistant institutional investors play the role of “supervisor”. High equity concentration and management shareholding ratio increase the negative governance effect of pressure-sensitive institutional investors, the high proportion of independent directors alleviates the negative governance effect of pressure-sensitive institutional investors. The pressure-sensitive institutional investors play the role of “conspirators”. Pressure-resistant institutional investors play a positive governance role in both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors mainly play a negative governance role in state-owned enterprises. The robustness test shows that the above conclusions are still valid. The mechanism discussion excludes that institutional investors influence the value of cash holdings by influencing the degree of corporate financing constraints. The pressure-resistant institutional investors, playing a positive governance role, have no significant impact on the level of cash holdings and inefficient investment and increase the value of cash holdings mainly by improving enterprises’ innovation activities. Although institutional investors increase the level of cash holdings, they also reduce enterprises’ innovation activities and improve non-efficient investment, thus reducing the value of cash holdings and playing a negative governance role.